


JavaScript global variable encapsulation module implementation code_javascript skills
The code below is my test code, the comments are very important:
/*global window,jQuery,validate_email,masterUI,$,rest*/
/**Enable ECMAScript "strict" operation for this function. See more:
* http://ejohn.org/blog/ecmascript-5-strict-mode-json-and-more/
* http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5020479/what-advantages-does-using-functionwindow-document-undefined-windo
* Q1: Why are window and document being fed instead of just being accessed normally?
* A1: Generally to fasten the identifier resolution process, having them as local variables can help (although IMO the performance improvements may be negligible).
* A2: Passing the global object is also a widely used technique on non-browser environments, where you don't have a window identifier at the global scope, e.g.:
* (function (global) {
* //..
* })(this); // this on the global execution context is the global object itself
* A3: Passing window and document allows the script to be more efficiently minified
*
* Q2: Why the heck is undefined being passed in?
* A1: This is made because the undefined global property in ECMAScript 3, is mutable, meaning that someone could change its value affecting your code, for example:
* undefined = true; // mutable
* (function (undefined) {
* alert(typeof undefined); // "undefined", the local identifier
* })(); // <-- no value passed, undefined by default
* If you look carefully undefined is actually not being passed (there's no argument on the function call),
* that's one of the reliable ways to get the undefined value, without using the property window.undefined.
*
*/
(function(window, document, undefined) {
"use strict";
window.test = {
init: function () {
"use strict";
alert("ok");
}
};
})(window , document);// no undefined parameter here to avoid using mutable window.undefined changed by other guy
1. Instructions, refer to an article and a post on stackoverflow
2. (function(){})() This kind of code is written in a separate js file. When the js file is loaded by html, the function will be executed. The windows.text object is actually created.
In the future, the html code can call the method in the form of test.init.
The test html part of the code is as follows:
[plain] view plaincopyprint?
< script type="text/javascript" src="../../master/plugin/artDialog4.1.6/jquery.artDialog.js">
3.Jslint will report Two questions. One is about undefined. I haven’t found any good method, so just let it complain. The final calling method of another format should be changed to:
[javascript ] view plaincopyprint?}(window, document)); }(window, document));
It doesn’t matter, just let it go. As long as it functions properly.

Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

Notepad++7.3.1
Easy-to-use and free code editor

SublimeText3 Chinese version
Chinese version, very easy to use

Zend Studio 13.0.1
Powerful PHP integrated development environment

Dreamweaver CS6
Visual web development tools

SublimeText3 Mac version
God-level code editing software (SublimeText3)

Hot Topics











Different JavaScript engines have different effects when parsing and executing JavaScript code, because the implementation principles and optimization strategies of each engine differ. 1. Lexical analysis: convert source code into lexical unit. 2. Grammar analysis: Generate an abstract syntax tree. 3. Optimization and compilation: Generate machine code through the JIT compiler. 4. Execute: Run the machine code. V8 engine optimizes through instant compilation and hidden class, SpiderMonkey uses a type inference system, resulting in different performance performance on the same code.

Python is more suitable for beginners, with a smooth learning curve and concise syntax; JavaScript is suitable for front-end development, with a steep learning curve and flexible syntax. 1. Python syntax is intuitive and suitable for data science and back-end development. 2. JavaScript is flexible and widely used in front-end and server-side programming.

The shift from C/C to JavaScript requires adapting to dynamic typing, garbage collection and asynchronous programming. 1) C/C is a statically typed language that requires manual memory management, while JavaScript is dynamically typed and garbage collection is automatically processed. 2) C/C needs to be compiled into machine code, while JavaScript is an interpreted language. 3) JavaScript introduces concepts such as closures, prototype chains and Promise, which enhances flexibility and asynchronous programming capabilities.

The main uses of JavaScript in web development include client interaction, form verification and asynchronous communication. 1) Dynamic content update and user interaction through DOM operations; 2) Client verification is carried out before the user submits data to improve the user experience; 3) Refreshless communication with the server is achieved through AJAX technology.

JavaScript's application in the real world includes front-end and back-end development. 1) Display front-end applications by building a TODO list application, involving DOM operations and event processing. 2) Build RESTfulAPI through Node.js and Express to demonstrate back-end applications.

Understanding how JavaScript engine works internally is important to developers because it helps write more efficient code and understand performance bottlenecks and optimization strategies. 1) The engine's workflow includes three stages: parsing, compiling and execution; 2) During the execution process, the engine will perform dynamic optimization, such as inline cache and hidden classes; 3) Best practices include avoiding global variables, optimizing loops, using const and lets, and avoiding excessive use of closures.

Python and JavaScript have their own advantages and disadvantages in terms of community, libraries and resources. 1) The Python community is friendly and suitable for beginners, but the front-end development resources are not as rich as JavaScript. 2) Python is powerful in data science and machine learning libraries, while JavaScript is better in front-end development libraries and frameworks. 3) Both have rich learning resources, but Python is suitable for starting with official documents, while JavaScript is better with MDNWebDocs. The choice should be based on project needs and personal interests.

Both Python and JavaScript's choices in development environments are important. 1) Python's development environment includes PyCharm, JupyterNotebook and Anaconda, which are suitable for data science and rapid prototyping. 2) The development environment of JavaScript includes Node.js, VSCode and Webpack, which are suitable for front-end and back-end development. Choosing the right tools according to project needs can improve development efficiency and project success rate.
