Home > Web Front-end > JS Tutorial > Explain in detail the practical skills in Immutable and React

Explain in detail the practical skills in Immutable and React

亚连
Release: 2018-06-02 11:40:23
Original
1863 people have browsed it

Immutable can bring dozens of times improvement to React applications. Some people say that the introduction of Immutable is a great invention in JavaScript in recent times, because React was so popular at the same time that its light was obscured. This article mainly introduces the practice of Immutable and React. Friends who need it can refer to it

Some people say that Immutable can bring dozens of times improvement to React applications, and some people say that the introduction of Immutable is the latest step in JavaScript. A great invention, because React was so popular at the same time, its light was obscured. These at least show that Immutable is very valuable, let’s find out below.

Objects in JavaScript are generally mutable (Mutable). Because reference assignment is used, the new object simply references the original object. Changing the new object will affect the original object. For example foo={a: 1}; bar=foo; bar.a=2 You will find that foo.a has also been changed to 2 at this time. Although this can save memory, when the application becomes complex, it causes very big hidden dangers, and the advantages brought by Mutable become outweighed by the gain. In order to solve this problem, the general approach is to use shallowCopy (shallow copy) or deepCopy (deep copy) to avoid modification, but this causes a waste of CPU and memory.
Immutable can solve these problems very well.

What is Immutable Data

Immutable Data is data that once created, cannot be changed. Any modification, addition, or deletion of an Immutable object returns a new Immutable object. The implementation principle of Immutable is Persistent Data Structure, that is, when using old data to create new data, it is necessary to ensure that the old data is available and unchanged at the same time. At the same time, in order to avoid the performance loss caused by deepCopy copying all nodes, Immutable uses Structural Sharing (structural sharing), that is, if a node in the object tree changes, only this node and the parent node affected by it are modified, and other nodes are modified. then share. Please take a look at the animation below:

After a lot of effort, I made a Gif animation, but it was forced to be converted into a static image. Please go to http://img.alicdn.com/tps/i2/ TB1zzi_KXXXXXctXFXXbrb8OVXX-613-575.gif Watch
There are currently two popular Immutable libraries:

1.immutable.js

Facebook engineer Lee Byron It took 3 years to build and appeared at the same time as React, but was not included in the React tool set by default (React provides a simplified Helper). It implements a complete set of Persistent Data Structure internally, as well as many easy-to-use data types. Like Collection, List, Map, Set, Record, Seq. There are very comprehensive map, filter, groupBy, reduce and find functional operation methods. At the same time, the API is as similar as possible to Object or Array.

There are three most important data structures to explain: (Java programmers should be the most familiar)

Map: a collection of key-value pairs, corresponding to Object, ES6 also has a special Map object
List: An ordered and repeatable list, corresponding to Array
Set: An unordered and non-repeatable list

2.seamless-immutable

Different from the academic style of Immutable.js, seamless-immutable does not implement a complete Persistent Data Structure, but uses Object.defineProperty (so it can only be used in IE9 and above) to extend JavaScript's Array and It is implemented by Object object and only supports two data types: Array and Object. The API is based on the same operation as Array and Object. The code base is very small, only 2K when downloaded compressed. Immutable.js is 16K compressed.

The following code is used to feel the difference between the two:

// 原来的写法
let foo = {a: {b: 1}};
let bar = foo;
bar.a.b = 2;
console.log(foo.a.b); // 打印 2
console.log(foo === bar); // 打印 true
// 使用 immutable.js 后
import Immutable from ‘immutable';
foo = Immutable.fromJS({a: {b: 1}});
bar = foo.setIn([‘a', ‘b'], 2);  // 使用 setIn 赋值
console.log(foo.getIn([‘a', ‘b'])); // 使用 getIn 取值,打印 1
console.log(foo === bar); // 打印 false
// 使用 seamless-immutable.js 后
import SImmutable from ‘seamless-immutable';
foo = SImmutable({a: {b: 1}})
bar = foo.merge({a: { b: 2}})  // 使用 merge 赋值
console.log(foo.a.b); // 像原生 Object 一样取值,打印 1
console.log(foo === bar); // 打印 false
Copy after login

Immutable Advantages

1. Immutable reduces the complexity brought by Mutable

Variable (Mutable) data couples the concepts of Time and Value, making the data difficult to trace back .

For example, the following piece of code:

function touchAndLog(touchFn) {
  let data = { key: ‘value' };
  touchFn(data);
  console.log(data.key); // 猜猜会打印什么?
}
Copy after login

Without looking at the code of touchFn, because I am not sure what it does to data. It's impossible to know what will be printed (isn't that bullshit). But if data is Immutable, you can know for sure that the value is printed.

2. Save memory

Immutable.js uses Structure Sharing and will try to reuse memory. Objects that are not referenced will be garbage collected.

import { Map} from ‘immutable';
 let a = Map({
 select: ‘users',
 filter: Map({ name: ‘Cam' })
})
let b = a.set(‘select', ‘people');
a === b; // false
a.get(‘filter') === b.get(‘filter'); // true
Copy after login

A and b above share the `filter` node that has not changed.

3. Undo/Redo, Copy/Paste, and even time travel are a piece of cake to make

because every time the data is The difference is that you just need to store the data in an array and take out the corresponding data wherever you want to go back. It is easy to develop the function of undo and redo.

I will provide an example of using Flux to do Undo later.

4 . Concurrency safety

传统的并发非常难做,因为要处理各种数据不一致问题,因此『聪明人』发明了各种锁来解决。但使用了 Immutable 之后,数据天生是不可变的,并发锁就不需要了。

然而现在并没什么卵用,因为 JavaScript 还是单线程运行的啊。但未来可能会加入,提前解决未来的问题不也挺好吗?

拥抱函数式编程

Immutable 本身就是函数式编程中的概念,纯函数式编程比面向对象更适用于前端开发。因为只要输入一致,输出必然一致,这样开发的组件更易于调试和组装。

像 ClojureScript,Elm 等函数式编程语言中的数据类型天生都是 Immutable 的,这也是为什么 ClojureScript 基于 React 的框架 — Om 性能比 React 还要好的原因。

使用 Immutable 的缺点

需要学习新的 API

No Comments

增加了资源文件大小

No Comments

容易与原生对象混淆

这点是我们使用 Immutable.js 过程中遇到最大的问题。写代码要做思维上的转变。

虽然 Immutable.js 尽量尝试把 API 设计的原生对象类似,有的时候还是很难区别到底是 Immutable 对象还是原生对象,容易混淆操作。

Immutable 中的 Map 和 List 虽对应原生 Object 和 Array,但操作非常不同,比如你要用 map.get(‘key') 而不是 map.key,array.get(0) 而不是 array[0]。另外 Immutable 每次修改都会返回新对象,也很容易忘记赋值。

当使用外部库的时候,一般需要使用原生对象,也很容易忘记转换。

下面给出一些办法来避免类似问题发生:

使用 Flow 或 TypeScript 这类有静态类型检查的工具

约定变量命名规则:如所有 Immutable 类型对象以 $$ 开头。

使用 Immutable.fromJS 而不是 Immutable.Map 或 Immutable.List 来创建对象,这样可以避免 Immutable 和原生对象间的混用。

更多认识

1 . Immutable.is

两个 immutable 对象可以使用 === 来比较,这样是直接比较内存地址,性能最好。但即使两个对象的值是一样的,也会返回 false:

let map1 = Immutable.Map({a:1, b:1, c:1});
let map2 = Immutable.Map({a:1, b:1, c:1});
map1 === map2;       // false
Copy after login

为了直接比较对象的值,immutable.js 提供了 Immutable.is 来做『值比较』,结果如下:

Immutable.is(map1, map2); // true
Copy after login

Immutable.is 比较的是两个对象的 hashCode 或 valueOf(对于 JavaScript 对象)。由于 immutable 内部使用了 Trie 数据结构来存储,只要两个对象的 hashCode 相等,值就是一样的。这样的算法避免了深度遍历比较,性能非常好。

后面会使用 Immutable.is 来减少 React 重复渲染,提高性能。

另外,还有 mori、cortex 等,因为类似就不再介绍。

2 . 与 Object.freeze、const 区别

Object.freeze 和 ES6 中新加入的 const 都可以达到防止对象被篡改的功能,但它们是 shallowCopy 的。对象层级一深就要特殊处理了。

3 . Cursor 的概念

这个 Cursor 和数据库中的游标是完全不同的概念。

由于 Immutable 数据一般嵌套非常深,为了便于访问深层数据,Cursor 提供了可以直接访问这个深层数据的引用。

import Immutable from ‘immutable';
import Cursor from ‘immutable/contrib/cursor';
let data = Immutable.fromJS({ a: { b: { c: 1 } } });
// 让 cursor 指向 { c: 1 }
let cursor = Cursor.from(data, [‘a', ‘b'], newData => {
// 当 cursor 或其子 cursor 执行 update 时调用
console.log(newData);
});
cursor.get(‘c'); // 1
cursor = cursor.update(‘c', x => x + 1);
cursor.get(‘c'); // 2
Copy after login

实践

与 React 搭配使用,Pure Render

熟悉 React 的都知道,React 做性能优化时有一个避免重复渲染的大招,就是使用 shouldComponentUpdate(),但它默认返回 true,即始终会执行 render() 方法,然后做 Virtual DOM 比较,并得出是否需要做真实 DOM 更新,这里往往会带来很多无必要的渲染并成为性能瓶颈。

当然我们也可以在 shouldComponentUpdate() 中使用使用 deepCopy 和 deepCompare 来避免无必要的 render(),但 deepCopy 和 deepCompare 一般都是非常耗性能的。

Immutable 则提供了简洁高效的判断数据是否变化的方法,只需 === 和 is 比较就能知道是否需要执行 render(),而这个操作几乎 0 成本,所以可以极大提高性能。修改后的 shouldComponentUpdate 是这样的:

import { is } from ‘immutable';
 shouldComponentUpdate: (nextProps = {}, nextState = {}) => {
  const thisProps = this.props || {}, thisState = this.state || {};
  if (Object.keys(thisProps).length !== Object.keys(nextProps).length ||
   Object.keys(thisState).length !== Object.keys(nextState).length) {
    return true;
  }
  for (const key in nextProps) {
   if (thisProps[key] !== nextProps[key] || !is(thisProps[key],      nextProps[key])) {
   return true;
  }
 }
  for (const key in nextState) {
   if (thisState[key] !== nextState[key] || !is(thisState[key], nextState[key])) {
    return true;
   }
  }
  return false;
 }
Copy after login

使用 Immutable 后,如下图,当红色节点的 state 变化后,不会再渲染树中的所有节点,而是只渲染图中绿色的部分:

你也可以借助 React.addons.PureRenderMixin 或支持 class 语法的pure-render-decorator 来实现。

setState 的一个技巧

React 建议把 this.state 当作 Immutable 的,因此修改前需要做一个 deepCopy,显得麻烦:

import ‘_' from ‘lodash';
const Component = React.createClass({
getInitialState() {
return {
data: { times: 0 }
}
},
handleAdd() {
let data = _.cloneDeep(this.state.data);
data.times = data.times + 1;
this.setState({ data: data });
// 如果上面不做 cloneDeep,下面打印的结果会是已经加 1 后的值。
console.log(this.state.data.times);
}
}
Copy after login

使用 Immutable 后:

getInitialState() {
 return {
  data: Map({ times: 0 })
 }
},
handleAdd() {
 this.setState({ data: this.state.data.update(‘times', v => v + 1) });
 // 这时的 times 并不会改变
 console.log(this.state.data.get(‘times'));
}
Copy after login

上面的 `handleAdd` 可以简写成:

handleAdd() {
 this.setState(({data}) => ({
 data: data.update(‘times', v => v + 1) })
});
}
Copy after login

2 . 与 Flux 搭配使用

由于 Flux 并没有限定 Store 中数据的类型,使用 Immutable 非常简单。

现在是实现一个类似带有添加和撤销功能的 Store:

import { Map, OrderedMap } from ‘immutable';
let todos = OrderedMap();
let history = []; // 普通数组,存放每次操作后产生的数据
let TodoStore = createStore({
 getAll() { return todos; }
});
Dispatcher.register(action => {
 if (action.actionType === ‘create') {
 let id = createGUID();
 history.push(todos); // 记录当前操作前的数据,便于撤销
 todos = todos.set(id, Map({
  id: id,
  complete: false,
  text: action.text.trim()
 }));
TodoStore.emitChange();
} else if (action.actionType === ‘undo') {
// 这里是撤销功能实现,
// 只需从 history 数组中取前一次 todos 即可
 if (history.length > 0) {
  todos = history.pop();
 }
 TodoStore.emitChange();
}
});
Copy after login

3 . 与 Redux 搭配使用

Redux 是目前流行的 Flux 衍生库。它简化了 Flux 中多个 Store 的概念,只有一个 Store,数据操作通过 Reducer 中实现;同时它提供更简洁和清晰的单向数据流(View -> Action -> Middleware -> Reducer),也更易于开发同构应用。目前已经在我们项目中大规模使用。

由于 Redux 中内置的 combineReducers 和 reducer 中的 initialState 都为原生的 Object 对象,所以不能和 Immutable 原生搭配使用。

幸运的是,Redux 并不排斥使用 Immutable,可以自己重写 combineReducers 或使用 redux-immutablejs 来提供支持。

上面我们提到 Cursor 可以方便检索和 update 层级比较深的数据,但因为 Redux 中已经有了 select 来做检索,Action 来更新数据,因此 Cursor 在这里就没有用武之地了。

总结

Immutable 可以给应用带来极大的性能提升,但是否使用还要看项目情况。由于侵入性较强,新项目引入比较容易,老项目迁移需要评估迁移。对于一些提供给外部使用的公共组件,最好不要把 Immutable 对象直接暴露在对外接口中。

如果 JS 原生 Immutable 类型会不会太美,被称为 React API 终结者的 Sebastian Markbåge 有一个这样的提案,能否通过现在还不确定。不过可以肯定的是 Immutable 会被越来越多的项目使用。

上面是我整理给大家的,希望今后会对大家有帮助。

相关文章:

Javascript中prototype与__proto__的关系详解

js中document.write和document.writeln的区别

Javascript 编码约定(编码规范)

The above is the detailed content of Explain in detail the practical skills in Immutable and React. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

Related labels:
source:php.cn
Statement of this Website
The content of this article is voluntarily contributed by netizens, and the copyright belongs to the original author. This site does not assume corresponding legal responsibility. If you find any content suspected of plagiarism or infringement, please contact admin@php.cn
Popular Tutorials
More>
Latest Downloads
More>
Web Effects
Website Source Code
Website Materials
Front End Template