


Detailed explanation of the comparison between static delayed binding and ordinary static efficiency in PHP
Comparison of PHP static delayed binding and ordinary static efficiency
It’s just a simple experiment, comparing the efficiency of delayed binding and non-delayed
Delayed binding mainly uses the static keyword to replace the original self, but the function is very powerful
Experimental code:
class A { protected static $cc1 = array('a1', 'b', 'c', 'd'); protected static $cc2 = array('a2', 'b', 'c', 'd'); protected static $cc3 = array('a3', 'b', 'c', 'd'); protected static $cc4 = array('a4', 'b', 'c', 'd'); protected static $cc5 = array('a5', 'b', 'c', 'd'); public static function n1() { return static::$cc1; } public static function n2() { return static::$cc2; } public static function n3() { return static::$cc3; } public static function n4() { return static::$cc4; } public static function n5() { return static::$cc5; } } class C extends A { } class B { protected static $cc1 = array('a1', 'b', 'c', 'd'); protected static $cc2 = array('a2', 'b', 'c', 'd'); protected static $cc3 = array('a3', 'b', 'c', 'd'); protected static $cc4 = array('a4', 'b', 'c', 'd'); protected static $cc5 = array('a5', 'b', 'c', 'd'); public static function n1() { return self::$cc1; } public static function n2() { return self::$cc2; } public static function n3() { return self::$cc3; } public static function n4() { return self::$cc4; } public static function n5() { return self::$cc5; } }
There are three classes A, B, and C above, all of which are static member variables and methods. Among them,
A class uses static delay,
B class is non-delay,
Class C inherits class A and implements delayed binding of static member variables and methods.
I won’t go into details about the process. The environment is PHP5.4.27. Directly upload the test results:
There are two situations,
1. When there are only A and B class (that is, no class is allowed to inherit class A), there is almost no difference in efficiency
2. When class A is inherited by class C, the performance of class A using static delayed binding It will be slightly worse than class B (as long as class A has inherited classes, it will be slower)
Loops 100,000 times, and the time difference between 2.8s ~ 3.2s is about 0.3 seconds. It should be negligible
Addition:Later, some test methods were added. If class C inherits class A and overloads some of the static member variables in class A, reload The more loads, the closer the speed will be to Class B (non-delayed), but the speed of Class A will still be slower than Class B and Class C
The above is the detailed content of Detailed explanation of the comparison between static delayed binding and ordinary static efficiency in PHP. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

Notepad++7.3.1
Easy-to-use and free code editor

SublimeText3 Chinese version
Chinese version, very easy to use

Zend Studio 13.0.1
Powerful PHP integrated development environment

Dreamweaver CS6
Visual web development tools

SublimeText3 Mac version
God-level code editing software (SublimeText3)

Hot Topics











PHP and Python each have their own advantages, and choose according to project requirements. 1.PHP is suitable for web development, especially for rapid development and maintenance of websites. 2. Python is suitable for data science, machine learning and artificial intelligence, with concise syntax and suitable for beginners.

PHP is a scripting language widely used on the server side, especially suitable for web development. 1.PHP can embed HTML, process HTTP requests and responses, and supports a variety of databases. 2.PHP is used to generate dynamic web content, process form data, access databases, etc., with strong community support and open source resources. 3. PHP is an interpreted language, and the execution process includes lexical analysis, grammatical analysis, compilation and execution. 4.PHP can be combined with MySQL for advanced applications such as user registration systems. 5. When debugging PHP, you can use functions such as error_reporting() and var_dump(). 6. Optimize PHP code to use caching mechanisms, optimize database queries and use built-in functions. 7

PHP is widely used in e-commerce, content management systems and API development. 1) E-commerce: used for shopping cart function and payment processing. 2) Content management system: used for dynamic content generation and user management. 3) API development: used for RESTful API development and API security. Through performance optimization and best practices, the efficiency and maintainability of PHP applications are improved.

PHP and Python each have their own advantages, and the choice should be based on project requirements. 1.PHP is suitable for web development, with simple syntax and high execution efficiency. 2. Python is suitable for data science and machine learning, with concise syntax and rich libraries.

PHP is still dynamic and still occupies an important position in the field of modern programming. 1) PHP's simplicity and powerful community support make it widely used in web development; 2) Its flexibility and stability make it outstanding in handling web forms, database operations and file processing; 3) PHP is constantly evolving and optimizing, suitable for beginners and experienced developers.

PHP and Python have their own advantages and disadvantages, and the choice depends on project needs and personal preferences. 1.PHP is suitable for rapid development and maintenance of large-scale web applications. 2. Python dominates the field of data science and machine learning.

PHP is suitable for web development, especially in rapid development and processing dynamic content, but is not good at data science and enterprise-level applications. Compared with Python, PHP has more advantages in web development, but is not as good as Python in the field of data science; compared with Java, PHP performs worse in enterprise-level applications, but is more flexible in web development; compared with JavaScript, PHP is more concise in back-end development, but is not as good as JavaScript in front-end development.

PHP is mainly procedural programming, but also supports object-oriented programming (OOP); Python supports a variety of paradigms, including OOP, functional and procedural programming. PHP is suitable for web development, and Python is suitable for a variety of applications such as data analysis and machine learning.
