


Discussing the performance issues of js string array splicing_javascript skills
We know that in js, string concatenation is one of the lowest performance operations.
For example:
var text="Hello";
text =" World!";
Early browsers did not optimize this operation.
Since strings are immutable, this means creating an intermediate string to store the result of the concatenation. Frequently creating and destroying strings in the background results in extremely low performance.
Therefore, array objects can be utilized for optimization.
For example:
var buffer=[],i=0; buffer[i++]="Hello"; //通过相应索引值添加元素比push方法快 buffer[i++]=" World!"; var text=buffer.join("");
In early browsers, there was no intermediate string creation and destruction. In the case of large number of string concatenations, this technique has been proven to be much faster than using addition.
Nowadays, browser optimization of strings has changed the situation of string concatenation. Safari, Opera, Chrome, Firefox and IE8 all show better performance using the addition operator. However, versions prior to IE8 were not optimized, so the array method still works. This does not mean that we need to do browser detection when string concatenation. Things to consider when deciding how to concatenate are the size and number of strings.
When the string is relatively small (less than 20 characters) and the number of connections is also small (less than 1000), all browsers can easily complete the connection in less than 1 millisecond using the addition operator. Performance drops significantly in IE7 when increasing the number or size of strings. As string sizes increase, the performance difference between addition operators and array composition techniques in Firefox becomes smaller. As the number of strings increases, the performance difference between addition operators and array composition techniques in Safari becomes smaller. The addition operator in Chrome and Opera keeps ahead when changing the number or size of strings.
Therefore, due to inconsistent performance under various browsers, the technology chosen depends on the actual situation and the browser you are facing.
In most cases, the addition operator is preferred; if the user mainly uses IE6 or 7, and the string size is large or there are many, then the array technique is worthwhile.
Generally speaking, if it is a semantic string, Array should not be used, such as:
'Hello, my name is ' name;
If the string is a "repetition of similar situations", it is recommended to use Array, such as:
var array = []; for (i = 0; i < length; i++) { array[i] = '<li>' + list[i] + '</li'>; } document.getElementById('somewhere').innerHTML = array.join('\n');
The performance comparison of js string array connection is introduced here. I hope it will be helpful to everyone.

Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

AI Hentai Generator
Generate AI Hentai for free.

Hot Article

Hot Tools

Notepad++7.3.1
Easy-to-use and free code editor

SublimeText3 Chinese version
Chinese version, very easy to use

Zend Studio 13.0.1
Powerful PHP integrated development environment

Dreamweaver CS6
Visual web development tools

SublimeText3 Mac version
God-level code editing software (SublimeText3)

Hot Topics



The performance comparison of PHP array key value flipping methods shows that the array_flip() function performs better than the for loop in large arrays (more than 1 million elements) and takes less time. The for loop method of manually flipping key values takes a relatively long time.

Performance comparison of different Java frameworks: REST API request processing: Vert.x is the best, with a request rate of 2 times SpringBoot and 3 times Dropwizard. Database query: SpringBoot's HibernateORM is better than Vert.x and Dropwizard's ORM. Caching operations: Vert.x's Hazelcast client is superior to SpringBoot and Dropwizard's caching mechanisms. Suitable framework: Choose according to application requirements. Vert.x is suitable for high-performance web services, SpringBoot is suitable for data-intensive applications, and Dropwizard is suitable for microservice architecture.

Effective techniques for optimizing C++ multi-threaded performance include limiting the number of threads to avoid resource contention. Use lightweight mutex locks to reduce contention. Optimize the scope of the lock and minimize the waiting time. Use lock-free data structures to improve concurrency. Avoid busy waiting and notify threads of resource availability through events.

PHP's array_group_by function can group elements in an array based on keys or closure functions, returning an associative array where the key is the group name and the value is an array of elements belonging to the group.

PHP's array_group() function can be used to group an array by a specified key to find duplicate elements. This function works through the following steps: Use key_callback to specify the grouping key. Optionally use value_callback to determine grouping values. Count grouped elements and identify duplicates. Therefore, the array_group() function is very useful for finding and processing duplicate elements.

When developing high-performance applications, C++ outperforms other languages, especially in micro-benchmarks. In macro benchmarks, the convenience and optimization mechanisms of other languages such as Java and C# may perform better. In practical cases, C++ performs well in image processing, numerical calculations and game development, and its direct control of memory management and hardware access brings obvious performance advantages.

The best way to generate random numbers in Go depends on the level of security required by your application. Low security: Use the math/rand package to generate pseudo-random numbers, suitable for most applications. High security: Use the crypto/rand package to generate cryptographically secure random bytes, suitable for applications that require stronger randomness.

Yes, in many programming languages, arrays can be used as function parameters, and the function will perform operations on the data stored in it. For example, the printArray function in C++ can print the elements in an array, while the printArray function in Python can traverse the array and print its elements. Modifications made to the array by these functions are also reflected in the original array in the calling function.
