Home Database Mysql Tutorial SQLSERVER2008中CTE的Split与CLR的性能比较 <转>

SQLSERVER2008中CTE的Split与CLR的性能比较 <转>

Jun 07, 2016 pm 03:40 PM
split performance

之前曾有一篇POST是关于用CTE实现Split,这种方法已经比传统的方法高效了。今天我们就这个方法与CLR实现的Split做比较。在CLR实现Split函数的确很简单,dotnet framework本身就有这个function了。 我们新建一个c#-数据库工程,然后建立一个用户自定义函数,Co

 

     之前曾有一篇POST是关于用CTE实现Split,这种方法已经比传统的方法高效了。今天我们就这个方法与CLR实现的Split做比较。在CLR实现Split函数的确很简单,dotnet framework本身就有这个function了。
    我们新建一个c#-数据库工程,然后建立一个用户自定义函数,Code像这样:

1

<span>   1:  </span>    <span>/// <summary></summary></span>

Copy after login

1

<span>   2:  </span>    <span>/// SQLs the array.</span>

Copy after login

1

<span>   3:  </span>    <span>/// </span>

Copy after login

1

<span>   4:  </span>    <span>/// <param name="str">The STR.</span>

Copy after login

1

<span>   5:  </span>    <span>/// <param name="delimiter">The delimiter.</span>

Copy after login

1

<span>   6:  </span>    <span>/// <returns></returns></span>

Copy after login

1

<span>   7:  </span>    <span>/// 1/8/2010  2:41 PM   author: v-pliu</span>

Copy after login

1

<span>   8:  </span>    [SqlFunction(Name = <span>"CLR_Split"</span>,

Copy after login

1

<span>   9:  </span>    FillRowMethodName = <span>"FillRow"</span>,

Copy after login

1

<span>  10:  </span>    TableDefinition = <span>"id nvarchar(10)"</span>)]

Copy after login

1

<span>  11:  </span> 

Copy after login

1

<span>  12:  </span>    <span>public</span> <span>static</span> IEnumerable SqlArray(SqlString str, SqlChars delimiter)

Copy after login

1

<span>  13:  </span>    {

Copy after login

1

<span>  14:  </span>        <span>if</span> (delimiter.Length == 0)

Copy after login

1

<span>  15:  </span>            <span>return</span> <span>new</span> <span>string</span>[1] { str.Value };

Copy after login

1

<span>  16:  </span>        <span>return</span> str.Value.Split(delimiter[0]);

Copy after login

1

<span>  17:  </span>    }

Copy after login

1

<span>  18:  </span> 

Copy after login

1

<span>  19:  </span>    <span>/// <summary></summary></span>

Copy after login

1

<span>  20:  </span>    <span>/// Fills the row.</span>

Copy after login

1

<span>  21:  </span>    <span>/// </span>

Copy after login

1

<span>  22:  </span>    <span>/// <param name="row">The row.</span>

Copy after login

1

<span>  23:  </span>    <span>/// <param name="str">The STR.</span>

Copy after login

1

<span>  24:  </span>    <span>/// 1/8/2010  2:41 PM   author: v-pliu</span>

Copy after login

1

<span>  25:  </span>    <span>public</span> <span>static</span> <span>void</span> FillRow(<span>object</span> row, <span>out</span> SqlString str)

Copy after login

1

<span>  26:  </span>    {

Copy after login

1

<span>  27:  </span>        str = <span>new</span> SqlString((<span>string</span>)row);

Copy after login

1

<span>  28:  </span>    }

Copy after login


然后编译,部署一切OK后,在SSMS中执行以下测试T-sql:

1

<span>   1:  </span><span>DECLARE</span> @<span>array</span> <span>VARCHAR</span>(<span>max</span>)

Copy after login
Copy after login

1

<span>   2:  </span><span>SET</span>  @<span>array</span> = <span>'39,15,93,68,64,43,90,58,39,9,26,26,89,47,91,57,98,16,55,9,63,29,69,16,41,76,34,60,68,64,61,53,32,30,11,72,57,63,36,43,22,14,60,38,24,5,66,26,26,21,22,99,55,18,7,10,46,76,27,88,9,29,89,75,48,72,94,59,35,19,0,35,79,11,87,49,68,30,91,35,9,7,34,47,41,61,98,13,22,1,26,80,35,48,34,92,24,85,90,51'</span>

Copy after login
Copy after login

1

<span>   3:  </span><span>SELECT</span> id <span>FROM</span> dbo.CLR_Split(@<span>array</span>,<span>','</span>)

Copy after login

 

我们来看它的Client Statistic:

SQLSERVER2008中CTE的Split与CLR的性能比较 <转>

接着我们执行测试T-sql使用相同的array:

1

<span>   1:  </span><span>DECLARE</span> @<span>array</span> <span>VARCHAR</span>(<span>max</span>)

Copy after login
Copy after login

1

<span>   2:  </span><span>SET</span>  @<span>array</span> = <span>'39,15,93,68,64,43,90,58,39,9,26,26,89,47,91,57,98,16,55,9,63,29,69,16,41,76,34,60,68,64,61,53,32,30,11,72,57,63,36,43,22,14,60,38,24,5,66,26,26,21,22,99,55,18,7,10,46,76,27,88,9,29,89,75,48,72,94,59,35,19,0,35,79,11,87,49,68,30,91,35,9,7,34,47,41,61,98,13,22,1,26,80,35,48,34,92,24,85,90,51'</span>

Copy after login
Copy after login

1

<span>   3:  </span><span>SELECT</span> item <span>FROM</span> strToTable(@<span>array</span>,<span>','</span>)

Copy after login

 

CTE实现的Split function的Client statistic:

SQLSERVER2008中CTE的Split与CLR的性能比较 <转>

通过对比,你可以发现CLR的performance略高于CTE方式,原因在于CLR方式有Cache功能,并且把一个复杂的运算放到程序里比DataBase里更加高效。

 

您还可以参考:

Split string in SQL Server 2005+ CLR vs. T-SQL

 

Author:Petter Liu    http://wintersun.cnblogs.com/

希望这篇POST对您有帮助。

出现禁止在 .NET Framework 中执行用户代码。启用 "clr enabled" 配置选项错误。

解决方法:查询分析器中运行如下代码即可:

exec sp_configure 'show advanced options', '1';
SQLSERVER2008中CTE的Split与CLR的性能比较 <转>
go
SQLSERVER2008中CTE的Split与CLR的性能比较 <转>
reconfigure;
SQLSERVER2008中CTE的Split与CLR的性能比较 <转>
go
SQLSERVER2008中CTE的Split与CLR的性能比较 <转>
exec sp_configure 'clr enabled', '1'
SQLSERVER2008中CTE的Split与CLR的性能比较 <转>
go
SQLSERVER2008中CTE的Split与CLR的性能比较 <转>
reconfigure;
SQLSERVER2008中CTE的Split与CLR的性能比较 <转>
exec sp_configure 'show advanced options', '1';
SQLSERVER2008中CTE的Split与CLR的性能比较 <转>
go

 

即可启用
"
配置选项 'show advanced options' 已从 0 更改为 1。请运行 RECONFIGURE 语句进行安装。
配置选项 'clr enabled' 已从 0 更改为 1。请运行 RECONFIGURE 语句进行安装。
配置选项 'show advanced options' 已从 1 更改为 1。请运行 RECONFIGURE 语句进行安装。
"
 

解释:
sp_configure [ [ @configname = ] 'option_name'
      [ , [ @configvalue = ] 'value' ] ]
 

备注
使用 sp_configure 可以显示或更改服务器级别的设置。若要更改数据库级别设置,请使用 ALTER DATABASE。若要更改仅影响当前用户会话的设置,请使用 SET 语句。
更新运行的配置值
为 option 指定新 value 时,结果集的 config_value 列中将显示该值。该值最初与 run_value 列中的值不同,后者显示当前运行的配置值。若要更新 run_value 列中的运行配置值,系统管理员必须运行 RECONFIGURE 或 RECONFIGURE WITH OVERRIDE。
RECONFIGURE 和 RECONFIGURE WITH OVERRIDE 对每个配置选项都有效。但是,基本 RECONFIGURE 语句会拒绝处于合理范围之外或可能导致选项冲突的任何选项值。例如,如果 recovery interval 的值大于 60 分钟,或 affinity mask 的值与 affinity I/O mask 的值重叠,则 RECONFIGURE 会生成错误。与此相反,RECONFIGURE WITH OVERRIDE 则接受具有正确数据类型的任何选项值,并使用指定的值强制进行重新配置。
有些配置选项(例如 affinity mask 和 recovery interval)被指定为高级选项。默认情况下,无法查看和更改这些选项。若要使这些选项可用,请将 Show Advanced Options 配置选项设置为 1。
使用 clr enabled 选项可以指定 Microsoft SQL Server 是否可以运行用户程序集。clr enabled 选项提供下列值。
值 说明
0
 不允许在 SQL Server 上执行程序集。
 
1
 允许在 SQL Server 上执行程序集。
 

clr enabled 选项是一个高级选项。如果使用 sp_configure 系统存储过程来更改该设置,则只有在 show advanced options 设置为 1 时才能更改 clr enabled。该设置在运行 sp_configure 后立即生效。不需要重新启动 SQL Server 实例。
注意:
运行 RECONFIGURE 时,clr enabled 选项的运行值将从 1 改为 0,所有包含用户程序集的应用程序域将立即被卸载

 

http://www.cnblogs.com/wintersun/archive/2010/01/08/1642265.html
Statement of this Website
The content of this article is voluntarily contributed by netizens, and the copyright belongs to the original author. This site does not assume corresponding legal responsibility. If you find any content suspected of plagiarism or infringement, please contact admin@php.cn

Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress

Undresser.AI Undress

AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover

AI Clothes Remover

Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool

Undress AI Tool

Undress images for free

Clothoff.io

Clothoff.io

AI clothes remover

AI Hentai Generator

AI Hentai Generator

Generate AI Hentai for free.

Hot Article

R.E.P.O. Energy Crystals Explained and What They Do (Yellow Crystal)
2 weeks ago By 尊渡假赌尊渡假赌尊渡假赌
Repo: How To Revive Teammates
1 months ago By 尊渡假赌尊渡假赌尊渡假赌
Hello Kitty Island Adventure: How To Get Giant Seeds
4 weeks ago By 尊渡假赌尊渡假赌尊渡假赌

Hot Tools

Notepad++7.3.1

Notepad++7.3.1

Easy-to-use and free code editor

SublimeText3 Chinese version

SublimeText3 Chinese version

Chinese version, very easy to use

Zend Studio 13.0.1

Zend Studio 13.0.1

Powerful PHP integrated development environment

Dreamweaver CS6

Dreamweaver CS6

Visual web development tools

SublimeText3 Mac version

SublimeText3 Mac version

God-level code editing software (SublimeText3)

The difference between vivox100s and x100: performance comparison and function analysis The difference between vivox100s and x100: performance comparison and function analysis Mar 23, 2024 pm 10:27 PM

Both vivox100s and x100 mobile phones are representative models in vivo's mobile phone product line. They respectively represent vivo's high-end technology level in different time periods. Therefore, the two mobile phones have certain differences in design, performance and functions. This article will conduct a detailed comparison between these two mobile phones in terms of performance comparison and function analysis to help consumers better choose the mobile phone that suits them. First, let’s look at the performance comparison between vivox100s and x100. vivox100s is equipped with the latest

How to show hidden performance overlays in Windows 11 How to show hidden performance overlays in Windows 11 Mar 24, 2024 am 09:40 AM

In this tutorial, we will help you reveal hidden performance overlays in Windows 11. Using Windows 11's Performance Overlay feature, you'll be able to monitor your system resources in real time. You can view real-time CPU usage, disk usage, GPU usage, RAM usage, etc. on your computer screen. This is convenient when you are playing games or using large graphics programs (such as video editors) and need to check how much system performance is affected when using a specific program. While there are some excellent free software available for monitoring system performance, and some built-in tools like Resource Monitor can be used to check system performance, the performance overlay feature also has its advantages. For example, you don't need to leave the program or app you're currently using or

Windows 10 vs. Windows 11 performance comparison: Which one is better? Windows 10 vs. Windows 11 performance comparison: Which one is better? Mar 28, 2024 am 09:00 AM

Windows 10 vs. Windows 11 performance comparison: Which one is better? With the continuous development and advancement of technology, operating systems are constantly updated and upgraded. As one of the world's largest operating system developers, Microsoft's Windows series of operating systems have always attracted much attention from users. In 2021, Microsoft released the Windows 11 operating system, which triggered widespread discussion and attention. So, what is the difference in performance between Windows 10 and Windows 11? Which

Comparing the performance of Win11 and Win10 systems, which one is better? Comparing the performance of Win11 and Win10 systems, which one is better? Mar 27, 2024 pm 05:09 PM

The Windows operating system has always been one of the most widely used operating systems on personal computers, and Windows 10 has long been Microsoft's flagship operating system until recently when Microsoft launched the new Windows 11 system. With the launch of Windows 11 system, people have become interested in the performance differences between Windows 10 and Windows 11 systems. Which one is better between the two? First, let’s take a look at W

Kirin 8000 processor competes with Snapdragon series: Who can be king? Kirin 8000 processor competes with Snapdragon series: Who can be king? Mar 25, 2024 am 09:03 AM

In the era of mobile Internet, smartphones have become an indispensable part of people's daily lives. The performance of smartphones often directly determines the quality of user experience. As the &quot;brain&quot; of a smartphone, the performance of the processor is particularly important. In the market, the Qualcomm Snapdragon series has always been a representative of strong performance, stability and reliability, and recently Huawei has also launched its own Kirin 8000 processor, which is said to have excellent performance. For ordinary users, how to choose a mobile phone with strong performance has become a key issue. Today we will

The local running performance of the Embedding service exceeds that of OpenAI Text-Embedding-Ada-002, which is so convenient! The local running performance of the Embedding service exceeds that of OpenAI Text-Embedding-Ada-002, which is so convenient! Apr 15, 2024 am 09:01 AM

Ollama is a super practical tool that allows you to easily run open source models such as Llama2, Mistral, and Gemma locally. In this article, I will introduce how to use Ollama to vectorize text. If you have not installed Ollama locally, you can read this article. In this article we will use the nomic-embed-text[2] model. It is a text encoder that outperforms OpenAI text-embedding-ada-002 and text-embedding-3-small on short context and long context tasks. Start the nomic-embed-text service when you have successfully installed o

Performance comparison of different Java frameworks Performance comparison of different Java frameworks Jun 05, 2024 pm 07:14 PM

Performance comparison of different Java frameworks: REST API request processing: Vert.x is the best, with a request rate of 2 times SpringBoot and 3 times Dropwizard. Database query: SpringBoot's HibernateORM is better than Vert.x and Dropwizard's ORM. Caching operations: Vert.x's Hazelcast client is superior to SpringBoot and Dropwizard's caching mechanisms. Suitable framework: Choose according to application requirements. Vert.x is suitable for high-performance web services, SpringBoot is suitable for data-intensive applications, and Dropwizard is suitable for microservice architecture.

Comparison of PHP and Go languages: big performance difference Comparison of PHP and Go languages: big performance difference Mar 26, 2024 am 10:48 AM

PHP and Go are two commonly used programming languages, and they have different characteristics and advantages. Among them, performance difference is an issue that everyone is generally concerned about. This article will compare PHP and Go languages ​​from a performance perspective, and demonstrate their performance differences through specific code examples. First, let us briefly introduce the basic features of PHP and Go language. PHP is a scripting language originally designed for web development. It is easy to learn and use and is widely used in the field of web development. The Go language is a compiled language developed by Google.

See all articles