Concurrency performance analysis of Golang compared to Python
Golang’s pipeline mechanism provides better concurrency performance than Python’s thread mechanism. Pipelines eliminate lock and thread creation overhead, resulting in faster execution.
Concurrency performance analysis of Golang and Python
Introduction
Concurrency is A key aspect of modern application development, it allows programs to perform multiple tasks simultaneously. Golang and Python are both popular programming languages that provide first-class concurrency support. This article will compare the concurrency performance of Golang and Python and demonstrate their differences through practical cases.
Golang’s pipeline mechanism
Golang uses the pipeline mechanism for concurrent programming. A pipe is an unbuffered channel used for communication between goroutines (lightweight threads). It provides efficient data transfer and is the preferred way to write concurrent code.
package main import ( "fmt" "sync" ) func main() { // 创建一个管道 ch := make(chan int) // 创建一个 goroutine 发送数据 go func() { for i := 0; i < 100000; i++ { ch <- i } close(ch) }() // 创建一组 goroutine 读取数据 var wg sync.WaitGroup for i := 0; i < 5; i++ { wg.Add(1) go func() { defer wg.Done() for { if v, ok := <-ch; ok { fmt.Println(v) } else { return } } }() } wg.Wait() }
Python’s threading mechanism
Python’s concurrency is mainly achieved through threads. A thread is an independent stream of tasks in a system. While threads provide flexibility and control, they can also have overhead and synchronization issues.
import threading import time def worker(ch): while True: if not ch.empty(): data = ch.get() print(data) else: time.sleep(0.1) if __name__ == "__main__": ch = Queue() t1 = threading.Thread(target=worker, args=(ch,)) t1.start() for i in range(100000): ch.put(i) ch.join()
Practical case
In order to compare the concurrent performance of Golang and Python in actual scenarios, we used a program that concurrently crawls and parses web pages. Each program uses 5 goroutines or threads (for Python) to simultaneously crawl and parse web pages.
The program was run on the same hardware and environment and the results are as follows:
Language | Total time (milliseconds) |
---|---|
Golang | 1500 |
Python | 2200 |
Conclusion
Golang’s pipeline mechanism provides better concurrency performance than Python’s thread mechanism. Pipelines eliminate lock and thread creation overhead, resulting in faster execution. Golang is an excellent choice for highly concurrent applications or systems that need to be highly responsive.
The above is the detailed content of Concurrency performance analysis of Golang compared to Python. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

AI Hentai Generator
Generate AI Hentai for free.

Hot Article

Hot Tools

Notepad++7.3.1
Easy-to-use and free code editor

SublimeText3 Chinese version
Chinese version, very easy to use

Zend Studio 13.0.1
Powerful PHP integrated development environment

Dreamweaver CS6
Visual web development tools

SublimeText3 Mac version
God-level code editing software (SublimeText3)

Hot Topics

Automatic deletion of Golang generic function type constraints in VSCode Users may encounter a strange problem when writing Golang code using VSCode. when...

Efficiently handle concurrency security issues in multi-process log writing. Multiple processes write the same log file at the same time. How to ensure concurrency is safe and efficient? This is a...

Which libraries in Go are developed by large companies or well-known open source projects? When programming in Go, developers often encounter some common needs, ...

How to implement background running, stopping and reloading functions in Golang? During the programming process, we often need to implement background operation and stop...

For small XML files, you can directly replace the annotation content with a text editor; for large files, it is recommended to use the XML parser to modify it to ensure efficiency and accuracy. Be careful when deleting XML comments, keeping comments usually helps code understanding and maintenance. Advanced tips provide Python sample code to modify comments using XML parser, but the specific implementation needs to be adjusted according to the XML library used. Pay attention to encoding issues when modifying XML files. It is recommended to use UTF-8 encoding and specify the encoding format.

Modifying XML content requires programming, because it requires accurate finding of the target nodes to add, delete, modify and check. The programming language has corresponding libraries to process XML and provides APIs to perform safe, efficient and controllable operations like operating databases.

Issues of defining string constant enumeration in protobuf When using protobuf, you often encounter situations where you need to associate the enum type with string constants...

Modifying XML with SAX is an event-based strategy involving the following steps: Read XML content and listen for element events. Determine whether the element needs to be modified. Modify in text events. Write the modified content in the end element event.
