Which golang framework has the best performance?
In Go application development, the Gin and Echo frameworks perform best in performance comparisons, providing high throughput and low latency, and are suitable for building high-load applications. In the benchmark, Gin scored 69047, Echo scored 65514, and GorillaMux, Martini, and Negroni scored lower in that order. In practical cases, Gin and Echo also have better response time and throughput when processing RESTful API requests.
Go Framework Performance Comparison
In a Go application development environment, choosing the right framework is crucial to optimizing performance. This article will compare the performance of popular Go frameworks and provide a practical example to illustrate the differences.
Framework comparison
The following are several frameworks that are widely used in Go applications:
- Gin: A high-performance HTTP framework based on web standards.
- Echo: A simple and fast Go HTTP framework focused on high throughput.
- GorillaMux: A powerful router that supports wildcard matching and handles errors gracefully.
- Martini: A lightweight, martini#gin-based framework for building RESTful APIs.
- Negroni: A middleware framework for writing secure, reusable and testable HTTP routers.
Performance Benchmark
To compare the performance of these frameworks, we used the TechEmpower benchmark, a popular HTTP server performance benchmarking tool. Tested on Ubuntu 20.04 server with 16 cores and 64 GB RAM.
Framework | TechEmpower Score |
---|---|
Gin | 69047 |
Echo | 65514 |
GorillaMux | 62397 |
Martini | 56263 |
Negroni | 52891 |
Practical case
Let us consider a practical case where we use different frameworks in the context of a RESTful API. The API will handle requests for get, create, update, and delete operations.
We use the Apache Benchmark tool to send 1000 requests to each framework at a rate of 100 concurrent requests. The test results are as follows:
Framework | Average response time (ms) | Throughput (request/second) |
---|---|---|
Gin | 6.1 | 1639 |
7.2 | 1389 | |
8.6 | 1163 | |
12.3 | 813 | |
14.7 | 680 |
Conclusion
According to TechEmpower test benchmarks and actual cases, Gin and Echo win and perform best in terms of performance. They provide high throughput and low latency and are suitable for building high-load Go applications.The above is the detailed content of Which golang framework has the best performance?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

AI Hentai Generator
Generate AI Hentai for free.

Hot Article

Hot Tools

Notepad++7.3.1
Easy-to-use and free code editor

SublimeText3 Chinese version
Chinese version, very easy to use

Zend Studio 13.0.1
Powerful PHP integrated development environment

Dreamweaver CS6
Visual web development tools

SublimeText3 Mac version
God-level code editing software (SublimeText3)

Hot Topics

Reading and writing files safely in Go is crucial. Guidelines include: Checking file permissions Closing files using defer Validating file paths Using context timeouts Following these guidelines ensures the security of your data and the robustness of your application.

How to configure connection pooling for Go database connections? Use the DB type in the database/sql package to create a database connection; set MaxOpenConns to control the maximum number of concurrent connections; set MaxIdleConns to set the maximum number of idle connections; set ConnMaxLifetime to control the maximum life cycle of the connection.

The lightweight PHP framework improves application performance through small size and low resource consumption. Its features include: small size, fast startup, low memory usage, improved response speed and throughput, and reduced resource consumption. Practical case: SlimFramework creates REST API, only 500KB, high responsiveness and high throughput

The learning curve of a PHP framework depends on language proficiency, framework complexity, documentation quality, and community support. The learning curve of PHP frameworks is higher when compared to Python frameworks and lower when compared to Ruby frameworks. Compared to Java frameworks, PHP frameworks have a moderate learning curve but a shorter time to get started.

Best practices: Create custom errors using well-defined error types (errors package) Provide more details Log errors appropriately Propagate errors correctly and avoid hiding or suppressing Wrap errors as needed to add context

JSON data can be saved into a MySQL database by using the gjson library or the json.Unmarshal function. The gjson library provides convenience methods to parse JSON fields, and the json.Unmarshal function requires a target type pointer to unmarshal JSON data. Both methods require preparing SQL statements and performing insert operations to persist the data into the database.

How to address common security issues in the Go framework With the widespread adoption of the Go framework in web development, ensuring its security is crucial. The following is a practical guide to solving common security problems, with sample code: 1. SQL Injection Use prepared statements or parameterized queries to prevent SQL injection attacks. For example: constquery="SELECT*FROMusersWHEREusername=?"stmt,err:=db.Prepare(query)iferr!=nil{//Handleerror}err=stmt.QueryR

The difference between the GoLang framework and the Go framework is reflected in the internal architecture and external features. The GoLang framework is based on the Go standard library and extends its functionality, while the Go framework consists of independent libraries to achieve specific purposes. The GoLang framework is more flexible and the Go framework is easier to use. The GoLang framework has a slight advantage in performance, and the Go framework is more scalable. Case: gin-gonic (Go framework) is used to build REST API, while Echo (GoLang framework) is used to build web applications.
