CPU-Z benchmark exposure: AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 ES processor is 12.9~25% faster than the 54W R9 7940HS

WBOY
Release: 2024-06-11 12:04:22
Original
836 people have browsed it

According to news from this site on June 8, the up owner of Station B @青华伊梦 conducted a running test with ASUS TUF Gaming A14 at the Taipei International Computer Show. Let’s take a look.

CPU-Z 跑分曝光:AMD 锐龙 AI 9 HX 370 ES 处理器比 54W 的 R9 7940HS 快 12.9~25%

This laptop is equipped with the Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 processor just released by AMD, but this ASUS engineering machine is only equipped with an engineering sample, so it only The ES code "00-0000009934-37" can be recognized.

As shown in the picture, the machine is equipped with the Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 processor, which has 4 Zen5 cores + 8 core Zen5c cores. In CPU-Z, the single-core score is 798.6 points, and the multi-core score is 798.6 points. 8893.6 points.

For comparison, the Mingfan UM790 model equipped with R9 7940HS (54W TDP operation) only scored 707.3 points and 7089.9 points, which means that this ES processor has lower performance than the previous generation. The Zen4 processor's single-core and multi-core performance increased by 12.9% and 25% respectively.

CPU-Z 跑分曝光:AMD 锐龙 AI 9 HX 370 ES 处理器比 54W 的 R9 7940HS 快 12.9~25%

However, CPU-Z may not be AMD’s strong point. This score is easily surpassed by the 13th and 14th generation Core H series processors, especially the Core i9. But this score clearly demonstrates the generational improvements in AMD's new processors, especially in multi-core performance. Of course, the main reason for the improvement in multi-core performance is the introduction of additional Zen5c cores.

According to AMD, the first batch of laptops equipped with Strix Point processors will be launched next month. By then we will have more accurate performance data, and this site will also provide you with detailed evaluations. Thank you very much. Please look forward to.

The above is the detailed content of CPU-Z benchmark exposure: AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 ES processor is 12.9~25% faster than the 54W R9 7940HS. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

Related labels:
source:ithome.com
Statement of this Website
The content of this article is voluntarily contributed by netizens, and the copyright belongs to the original author. This site does not assume corresponding legal responsibility. If you find any content suspected of plagiarism or infringement, please contact admin@php.cn
Popular Tutorials
More>
Latest Downloads
More>
Web Effects
Website Source Code
Website Materials
Front End Template