The way of interaction between project parties and the community, which the encryption circle was once proud of, is facing a crisis.
Interaction, on-chain contribution, and obtaining airdrops were once the characteristics of the encryption circle.
ZKsync, after numerous airdrop rules, struck down this traditional interaction method that takes into account the bond of trust with a statement that "all decisions related to airdrop distribution are made at the sole discretion of the ZKsync Association."
Previously, the co-founder of Taiko also claimed when faced with questions about "airdrops": "The rules are not transparent because transparency cannot resolve differences."
Star project parties seem to be getting more and more Many regard airdrops as a power to allocate resources that can be used arrogantly without bearing consequences, rather than as a mutual complement between community users and project parties.
We are worried that the encryption spirit of decentralization, transparency and fairness is disappearing.
Since the heavy hit from LayerZero’s anti-witch short last month, Luluhuan suffered another misfortune.
On June 11, ZKsync announced that it will conduct an airdrop next week and open airdrop inquiries, finally getting the answer to its four-year interaction. According to official disclosures, there are a total of 695,000 qualified addresses on the ZKsync chain, accounting for approximately 10% of the total 6.827 million addresses, which is far lower than the range of 2.05 million to 2.9 million addresses predicted in the previous TrustGo report.
According to community statistics, 9203 addresses received 23.9% of the total airdrop volume.
After 4 years of waiting, everything was in vain. Many users showed off their Unfortunately annihilation on X.
ZKsync has always been the white moonlight of the "hair-raising party" because of its star founder and star capital aura.
A community influencer said, "Some people quit their jobs to do ZKs, some sell their houses to do ZKs, and some take loans to do ZKs. They have permanently lost the qualification to start accounts and increase their quota, and they have completely failed." It's like a four-year love affair was betrayed, "three years of salary and countless late nights of warmth", but in exchange for the departure of the goddess ZKS.
As far as conventional airdrops are concerned, the core criteria for airdrops usually lie in the activity level, duration, and funding level of the interaction. ZKsync has set a total of 7 airdrop rules for this time. Threshold:
1. The conditions for the Era main network are to interact with 10 non-token smart contracts
2. The payer of the Era main network has used at least 5 transactions
3. 10 ERC 20 tokens have been traded on the main network
4. The DEX and lending protocols tracked on the Era main network provide arbitrary liquidity
5. At least hold the magic lamp NFT
6. Before the main network, Active on ZKsync Lite for more than 3 months
7. Donate to Gitcoin through ZKsync Lite in the last round
It is just an overly strict rule, which is not enough for the ever-changing hair market. Surprisingly, an airdrop clause has plunged the project into a vortex of public opinion where the rules are opaque.
ZKsync wrote on the airdrop application interface, "Meeting one or more of the above airdrop criteria does not imply a legal right or requirement to obtain an airdrop. All decisions related to airdrop allocation are made by the ZKsync Association at its sole discretion." .
This statement caused dissatisfaction among community users, and many users raised questions.
A netizen in the encryption community said: "We can understand the strictness of the airdrop rules, but we cannot tolerate the unscrupulous and arbitrary behavior of the project side."
This clause completely throws away the right to determine the airdrop. If it is outside the airdrop standards, whether it can receive an airdrop seems to depend entirely on the mood of the project team.
In addition, ZKsync also stated that the tokens allocated to addresses that meet the airdrop conditions but have less than 450 tokens will be recycled, which has also caused dissatisfaction among some small users.
Although the time period is long and there are many tasks that need to be participated in, community users have always had high expectations for ZKsync. If it is strict rules or some non-traditional The practices are still within the acceptable range of the community. However, the recent series of puzzling actions taken by ZKsync have caused more and more doubts and questions among community members.
Nearly 10% of the number of qualified airdrop addresses means that most of the token shares are retained in the hands of the project party. Many users have questioned this, believing that ZKsync’s move is essentially to reduce market liquidity and secretly Hide the rat barn. In this regard, ZKsync is currently in a state of turning a deaf ear and has not issued any positive response to users' various doubts.
On the contrary, as the rat warehouse controversy escalated, Nansen, who was responsible for ZKsync data review, began to take the initiative to distance himself from the relationship.
Nansen officially posted on Known scammers. However, we did not (help ZKsync) conduct a witch review or provide advice on the distribution of airdrops.”
In addition, NFT trading platform Element stated that as the largest on ZKsync. In the NFT market, the platform has not received any ZK token airdrops.
All the fingers point to ZKsync itself.
Every airdrop is accompanied by joy and worry, and there are not a few who actually win the airdrop. Various airdrop screenshots began to circulate on the Internet, seemingly trying to prove to the public that "ZKsync's airdrop is fair and effective, but you just don't meet the requirements."
Bankless Lianchuang David Hoffman also began to come forward and said that according to the survey data obtained in Discord, most people expressed overall satisfaction with the ZKsync airdrop. In addition, he also classified the criticism on the X platform as robot speech.
The "ZKsync native project" Zyfi announced on the social platform that it received 1.642 million ZK tokens. This proves the effectiveness of airdrops from the side.
However, most of the professional hair-raising parties in the Chinese-speaking area were almost wiped out, and most studios were once again reduced to tool men.
As airdrop addresses dropped sharply and the Rat Warehouse crisis escalated, the Anti-Rat Warehouse Alliance came into being.
ZKsync ecological NFT project zkApes announced on social platforms that it has formed an alliance with Element, Argent, WOOFi and other projects, with the goal of putting pressure on ZK Nation and Matter Labs to boycott rat warehouse trading and other behaviors.
So, will the dual pressure from ecological projects and users force ZKsync to make a new airdrop decision?
This answer has two sides. If it accepts pressure and chooses reform, ZKsync will undoubtedly acquiesce to the existence of a rat warehouse; but if it continues to maintain the status quo, the ZKsync ecosystem will most likely lose most users and developers.
In the airdrop track, the project party and the Lumao Party have always been in a game of each other. However, if the balance of power is tilted towards either party, it will endanger the interests of the other party. When the weight is biased towards the project party, When the project party can do whatever they want, then the Mao Mao Party becomes the tool man.
From the recent Taiko to LayerZero, it is normal to scold the project team because the airdrop does not meet expectations. The transparency of airdrop rules should be the top priority in the project decentralization process.
The above is the detailed content of ZKsync is willful and airdrops into the era of no rules. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!
![[Web front-end] Node.js quick start](https://img.php.cn/upload/course/000/000/067/662b5d34ba7c0227.png)
