Home > web3.0 > body text

Rainmakers in the Crypto Market: A Look at the Top Fee-Based Protocols

WBOY
Release: 2024-06-21 22:10:52
Original
867 people have browsed it

Original title: "The Rainmakers of the Crypto Market"

Introduction

This newsletter focuses on analyzing the protocols that generate the most significant fees (including blockchain and decentralized applications). We focus on these The reasons for the agreement mainly include:

Which agreements are users more likely to pay for services? What types of services do these agreements provide and what are their business models? What is the total amount actually paid by users? Which specific market segments are more popular than others? Are there any protocols that dominate certain market segments? By analyzing a detailed chart, we will take a deep dive into the industry trends in the cryptocurrency market.

Let’s explore in detail!

1. Focus on the top fee-based protocols in the blockchain

Rainmakers in the Crypto Market: A Look at the Top Fee-Based Protocols

Protocols focused on include: Ethereum, Tron, Bitcoin, Solana, BNB Chain and Base.

Main fees come from general blockchains

Out of the top 20 protocols, 5 are layer 1 (L1) blockchains and only 1 is a layer 2 (L2) blockchain.

Ethereum has had the highest fee output in the past 30 days, reaching approximately $180 million. Although Base’s average transaction fees are relatively low at around $0.03 (compared to Ethereum L1’s $4.5), Base also managed to break into the top 20 due to increased user activity at the L2 level.

With the exception of L1 and L2 blockchains, all other protocols in the top 20 fall under the decentralized finance (DeFi) category.

2. Top fee-based protocols, focusing on Lido Finance and Jito

Rainmakers in the Crypto Market: A Look at the Top Fee-Based Protocols

Key protocols: Lido Finance and Jito.

Lido has the highest fee generation among all crypto applications

Jito operates two different businesses: Liquidity Staking (JitoSOL) and Maximize Extractable Value (MEV) Market, the former through AUM-based management Profitability is achieved through fees, while the latter is profitable through MEV tips collected from validators (this chart only includes MEV tips).

In contrast, Lido focuses on liquidity staking as a business, earning commissions through staking rewards collected from depositors. Lido generates roughly twice as much fees as Jito, but Jito is growing faster.

Lido has $3.35 billion in pledged assets under management, while Jito has $160 million. Lido has a fully diluted market capitalization of $190 million, compared with Jito's $250 million.

3. Top fee protocols, focusing on decentralized exchanges (DEX)

Rainmakers in the Crypto Market: A Look at the Top Fee-Based Protocols

Key protocols: Uniswap, PancakeSwap, Aerodrome, Uniswap Labs and GMX.

Uniswap DAO dominates the DEX category with monthly fees approaching $100 million

Uniswap DAO has the highest fee output in the DEX space. Notably, Uniswap Labs is considered as an independent entity that makes money by charging users to plug into the Uniswap protocol using the official Uniswap Labs front-end application.

Compared to other DEXs in the top 20, Uniswap DAO’s fee output is approximately twice theirs.

Aerodrome, as a Base-based DEX, has twice the fee output of its underlying L2 blockchain.

4. Top fee-based protocols, focusing on MakerDAO and Ethena

Rainmakers in the Crypto Market: A Look at the Top Fee-Based Protocols

Key protocols: MakerDAO and Ethena.

Ethena has the potential to surpass MakerDAO in terms of fees

MakerDAO and Ethena dominate the decentralized stablecoin issuer space. The largest stablecoin issuers in the market, such as Tether (USDT) and Circle (USDC), are not included because their fees and revenue are primarily generated off-chain.

Ethena is expected to be launched in November 2024, while MakerDAO was already online as early as November 2017.

5. Top fee-based protocols, focusing on lending protocols

Rainmakers in the Crypto Market: A Look at the Top Fee-Based Protocols

Protocols focused on include: Aave, Morpho, Compound and Venus.

Aave is the fourth largest fee generator in the cryptocurrency space.

In the lending category, Aave dominates, with a $30 million fee gap between it and second-placed Morpho.

While Compound and Aave both launched in 2020, Aave has managed to surpass Compound in terms of active loans and fee generation.

Although Aave leads the entire lending field, Venus has a clear lead in the BNB chain’s lending market, with approximately 90% of fees currently coming from its operations on the BNB chain.

6. Top charging protocols; chain breakdown

Rainmakers in the Crypto Market: A Look at the Top Fee-Based Protocols

This part mainly introduces the blockchain for application deployment.

Most of the top fee-based applications choose to deploy on multiple blockchains.

In the crypto space, most of the top 20 fee-based applications are deployed on Ethereum (both L1 and L2).

It is worth mentioning that asset issuers (such as stablecoin issuers and liquidity pledge providers) mostly adopt single chain management, and their core products (stablecoins or LST) act as bridge assets on multiple other chains. Role.

In this top 20, Aerodrome is the only application starting from the L2 blockchain (Base).

FAQ

What are the fees?

The fee refers to the total amount paid by the end user of the agreement service.

Different market sectors have different fee structures, as each sector’s protocols have their own unique business models:

  • Blockchain L1 and L2 = Transaction fees are collected by selling block space
  • Liquidity Staking = Earn rewards by investing users’ staked assets
  • Exchanges (DEX, Derivatives) = Exchange assets through transaction fees
  • Loans = Through loan services that provide interest
  • Stablecoin Issuers = By providing interest-bearing USD or investments Ways for users to deposit money to earn income
  • Asset management = earn income by investing users’ deposits

What is the difference between fees and income?

  • Income is calculated based on the fee collection rate (%) of the agreement.
  • This charge rate can vary between 0 and 100%.
  • Currently, Uniswap DAO and Bitcoin have 0% adoption, while Ethereum’s is typically around 80%.

What is the difference between income and income?

  • Earnings are obtained by deducting token incentives and operating expenses from income.
  • Token incentives refer to the protocol’s expenditure on user acquisition, calculated based on the dollar value of the protocol’s native token.
  • Operating expenses include the investment in manpower and infrastructure during the development, maintenance and optimization of the protocol.
  • Please note that most protocols do not disclose their operating expenses on the chain, which is why many protocols have not yet introduced this indicator.

When should expenses, income or benefits be considered?

As a rule of thumb, investors should focus on fees in the early stages of a protocol, when monetization has not yet begun, and on revenues and/or gains in the stages where monetization has already begun:

  • Early stage: Pay attention to the cost, showing that the agreement has paying customers.
  • Post-stage: Focus on revenue, showing the protocol is able to monetize its paying customers.
  • Maturity stage: Focus on returns, reflecting the protocol’s ability to create value for its token holders.

Also, keep an eye on the following ratio:

  • Revenue/Fees = Ideally, a display agreement has greater influence over the supply side (LP) and is able to charge higher fees.
  • Revenue / Revenue = Ideally, indicates that the protocol has lower user acquisition costs and operational overhead, allowing it to retain a higher proportion of revenue as revenue.

The above is the detailed content of Rainmakers in the Crypto Market: A Look at the Top Fee-Based Protocols. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

source:chaincatcher.com
Statement of this Website
The content of this article is voluntarily contributed by netizens, and the copyright belongs to the original author. This site does not assume corresponding legal responsibility. If you find any content suspected of plagiarism or infringement, please contact admin@php.cn
Popular Tutorials
More>
Latest Downloads
More>
Web Effects
Website Source Code
Website Materials
Front End Template
About us Disclaimer Sitemap
php.cn:Public welfare online PHP training,Help PHP learners grow quickly!