Which is better, Sol Actions or Blinks vs. Ethereum, Farcaster or Lens?

Solana Actions 和 Blinks 与 Ethereum Farcaster 和 Lens对比！最近，Solana和Dialect联合推出了新的Solana概念“Actions and Blinks”，通过浏览器扩展实现一键操作功能，如兑换、投票、捐赠和铸币。

Actions简化了各种操作和交易的执行，而Blinks则通过时间同步和顺序记录来确保网络共识和一致性。两者结合，使Solana能够提供高性能、低延迟的区块链体验。

Blinks的开发需要Web2应用的支持，这带来了信任、兼容性以及Web2与Web3合作的问题。 与Farcaster和Lens Protocol相比，Actions和Blinks更依赖Web2应用来获取流量，而后者更依赖链上的安全性。

今天本站小编给大家分享的是Solana Actions 和 Blinks 与 Ethereum Farcaster 和 Lens的对比，需要的朋友一起看看吧！

1、Actions和Blinks的工作原理

1）Actions（Solana Actions）

根据官方定义：Solana Actions 是返回 Solana 区块链上交易的标准化API。这些交易可以在各种环境中预览、签署和发送，包括二维码、按钮+小部件和互联网上的网站。

Actions 可以简单理解为等待签名的交易。进一步扩展，Actions 是 Solana 网络中对交易处理机制的抽象描述，涵盖了交易处理、合约执行和数据操作等多种任务。用户可以通过 Actions 发送交易，包括Token转移和购买数字资产。开发者使用 Actions 调用和执行智能合约，实现复杂的链上逻辑。

Solana 通过“Transactions”来处理这些任务，每个 Transaction 由一系列在特定账户之间执行的指令组成。通过并行处理和 Gulf Stream 协议，Solana 将交易预先转发给验证者，减少确认延迟。通过细粒度的锁定机制，Solana 可以同时处理大量无冲突的交易，大大提高了系统吞吐量。Solana 使用 Runtime 执行交易和智能合约指令，确保在执行过程中交易输入、输出和状态的正确性。

初次执行后，交易等待区块确认。一旦大多数验证者同意一个区块，交易就被认为是最终的。Solana 每秒可以处理数千笔交易，确认时间低至400毫秒。得益于 Pipeline 和 Gulf Stream 机制，网络的吞吐量和性能得到了进一步提升。

Actions 不仅仅是任务或操作，它们可以是交易、合约执行或数据处理。这些操作类似于其他区块链中的交易或合约调用，但 Solana 的 Actions 具有独特的优势：

• 高效处理：Solana 设计了一种高效的方法来处理 Actions，使其在大规模网络中快速执行。

• 低延迟：Solana 的高性能架构确保了 Actions 的处理延迟非常低，支持高频交易和应用。

• 灵活性：Actions 可以执行各种复杂操作，包括智能合约调用和数据存储/检索（更多详细信息请见扩展链接）。

2）Blinks（区块链链接）

根据官方定义：Blinks 可以将任何 Solana Action 转换为可共享、富含元数据的链接。Blinks 使支持 Action 的客户端（浏览器扩展钱包、机器人）能够向用户展示更多功能。在网站上，Blinks 可以立即在钱包中触发交易预览，而无需重定向到去中心化应用；在 Discord 中，机器人可以将 Blinks 扩展为一组交互按钮。这使得任何显示 URL 的网页界面都能实现链上交互。

简单来说，Solana Blinks 将 Solana Actions 转换为可共享的链接（类似于 HTTP）。通过在支持的钱包（如 Phantom、Backpack 和 Solflare）中启用相关功能，网站和社交媒体可以成为链上交易的场所，使任何具有 URL 的网站都能直接发起 Solana 交易。

总之，尽管 Solana Actions 和 Blinks 是无权限的协议/标准，但它们仍然需要客户端应用和钱包来最终帮助用户签署交易，相较于意图叙述求解器。

Actions 和 Blinks 的直接目标是将 Solana 的链上操作“HTTP 链接化”，将其解析到 Web2 应用如 Twitter 中。

2. Application of decentralized social protocol on Ethereum

1) Farcaster Protocol

Farcaster is a decentralized social graph protocol based on Ethereum and Optimism, enabling applications to use blockchain, P2P networks and Decentralized technology interconnection such as distributed ledgers. This allows users to seamlessly migrate and share content between different platforms without relying on a single centralized entity. Its Open Graph protocol, which automatically extracts linked content from social network posts and injects interactive features, enables content shared by users to be automatically extracted and transformed into interactive applications.

Decentralized network: Farcaster relies on a decentralized network, avoiding the single point of failure problem of centralized servers that is common in traditional social networks. It uses distributed ledger technology to ensure data security and transparency.

Public key encryption: Every Farcaster user has a pair of public and private keys. The public key is used to identify the user, while the private key is used to sign their actions. This approach ensures the privacy and security of user data.

Data portability: User data is stored in a decentralized storage system rather than on a single server. This gives users complete control over their data and the ability to move it between different apps.

Verifiable identity: Through public key encryption technology, Farcaster ensures that each user’s identity is verifiable. Users can prove control of an account by signing actions.

Decentralized Identifiers (DIDs): Farcaster uses decentralized identifiers (DIDs) to identify users and content. DIDs are based on public key encryption and are highly secure and immutable.

Data consistency: To ensure data consistency on the network, Farcaster uses a blockchain-like consensus mechanism (with "posts" as nodes). This mechanism ensures that all nodes agree on user data and operations, maintaining data integrity and consistency.

Decentralized Applications: Farcaster provides a development platform that allows developers to build and deploy decentralized applications (DApps). These applications can be seamlessly integrated into the Farcaster network to provide users with a variety of functions and services.

Security and Privacy: Farcaster emphasizes the privacy and security of user data. All data transmission and storage are encrypted, and users can choose to make content public or private.

In Farcaster’s new feature Frames (different Frames integrate with Farcaster and run independently), users can turn “casts” (similar to posts, including text, images, videos, and links) into interactive applications. This content is stored in a decentralized network, ensuring its permanence and immutability. Each post has a unique identifier when published, making it traceable and verifying the user's identity through a decentralized authentication system. As a decentralized social protocol, Farcaster’s clients integrate seamlessly with Frames.

2) Main principles

Farcaster protocol is divided into three main layers: identity layer, data layer (Hubs) and application layer. Each layer has specific functions and roles.

A. Identity layer

Function: Responsible for managing and verifying user identities; providing decentralized identity authentication to ensure the uniqueness and security of user identities. Includes four registries: ID Registry, Fname, Key Registry and Storage Registry (refer to link 1 for details).

Technical principle: Use decentralized identifiers (DIDs) based on public key encryption technology. Each user has a unique DID used to identify and verify their identity. The use of public and private key pairs ensures that only the user can control and manage their identity information. The identity layer ensures seamless migration and authentication between different applications and services.

B. Data layer - Hubs

Function: Responsible for storing and managing user-generated data, providing a decentralized data storage system to ensure data security, integrity and accessibility.

Technical principle: Hubs are decentralized data storage nodes distributed in the network. Each Hub serves as an independent storage unit and is responsible for storing and managing part of the data. Data is distributed across hubs and protected by encryption technology. The data layer ensures high availability and scalability of data, allowing users to access and migrate their data at any time.

C. Application layer

Function: Provide a platform to develop and deploy decentralized applications (DApps), supporting various application scenarios, such as social networks, content publishing and messaging.

Technical principle: Developers can use the APIs and tools provided by Farcaster to build and deploy decentralized applications. The application layer integrates seamlessly with the identity layer and data layer to ensure authentication and data management during application usage. Decentralized applications run on decentralized networks and do not rely on centralized servers, thus enhancing the reliability and security of applications.

3) Summary

A.Solana’s Actions & Blinks

Solana’s Actions and Blinks are designed to connect the traffic channels of Web2 applications. Its direct impact is as follows:

• User perspective: Simplifying the transaction process, but increasing the risk of fund theft.

• Solana perspective: Greatly enhances cross-border traffic effects, but faces compatibility and support challenges under Web2 censorship.

Within Solana’s broad ecosystem, future developments such as Layer2, SVM and mobile operating systems may further enhance these capabilities.

B. Ethereum’s Farcaster Protocol

Compared with Solana’s strategy, Ethereum’s Farcaster protocol weakens Web2 traffic integration and enhances overall censorship resistance and security. The Farcaster + EVM model is more in line with the native concepts of Web3.

4) Lens Protocol

Lens Protocol is another decentralized social graph protocol designed to give users complete control over their social data and content. With Lens Protocol, users can create, own and manage their social graphs and seamlessly migrate them across different apps and platforms. The protocol uses NFTs to represent users’ social graphs and content, ensuring data uniqueness and security. As a protocol on Ethereum, Lens Protocol has some similarities and differences with Farcaster:

A. Similarities:

• User control: In these two protocols, users have complete control over their data and content Control.

• Authentication: Both use decentralized identifiers (DIDs) and encryption technology to ensure the security and uniqueness of user identities.

B. Differences:

Technical architecture:

• Farcaster: Based on Ethereum (L1), it is divided into an identity layer that manages user identities, a data layer (Hubs) for decentralized storage nodes, and Provides the application layer of the DApps development platform and uses offline Hubs for data dissemination.

• Lens Protocol: Based on Polygon (L2), using NFT to represent the user's social graph and content, all activities are stored in the user's wallet, emphasizing data ownership and portability.

Verification and data management:

• Farcaster: Uses distributed storage nodes (Hubs) to manage data, ensuring security and high availability, handle updates once a year and reaches consensus through delta graph.

• Lens Protocol: Personal Data Archive NFT ensures the uniqueness and security of data without the need for updates.

App Ecosystem:

Farcaster: Provides a comprehensive DApps development platform, seamlessly integrated with its identity and data layer.

Lens Protocol: Focuses on the portability of user social graphs and content, supporting seamless switching between different platforms and applications.

Through this comparison, we can see that Farcaster and Lens Protocol have similarities in user control and authentication, but significant differences in data storage and ecosystem. Farcaster emphasizes layered structures and decentralized storage, while Lens Protocol highlights the use of NFTs for data portability and ownership.

3. Which protocol can be the first to achieve large-scale application?

Through the above analysis, these three protocols each have their own advantages and challenges.

Solana has quickly gained traction by leveraging social media platforms and using Blinks for its high performance and ability to turn any website or app into a cryptocurrency trading gateway. However, its reliance on Web2 brings trade-offs between traffic and security.

Lens Protocol, founded in 2022, uses its modular design and on-chain storage to provide good scalability and transparency, capturing early market opportunities, but may face challenges in cost, scalability and market FOMO sentiment.

The advantage of Farcaster is that its design is closest to Web3 principles and provides the highest degree of decentralization. However, this also brings challenges in technology iteration and user management.

The above is the detailed content of Which is better, Sol Actions or Blinks vs. Ethereum, Farcaster or Lens?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!