Intel Core Ultra 9 285K processor exposed: CineBench R23 multi-core running score is 18% higher than i9-14900K

News from this website on July 25th. Source Jaykihn posted a tweet on the X platform yesterday (July 24th), sharing the running score data of the Intel Core Ultra 9 285K "Arrow Lake-S" desktop processor. The results are It looks 18% faster than Core 14900K.

This website quoted the content of the tweet. The source shared the running scores of the two versions of Intel Core Ultra 9 285K processor, ES2 and QS, and compared it with the Core i9-14900K processor.
According to reports, Arrow Lake-S QS has a TDP of 250W when running workloads such as Cinebench R23, Geekbench 5, SpeedoMeter, WebXPRT4 and CrossMark. By comparison, the i9-14900K has a peak PL2 power rating of 253W.
Introduction to the Intel Core Ultra 9 285K “Arrow Lake-S” desktop processor. The PL1 power consumption of the Intel Core Ultra 9 285K processor is 125W and uses the 7nm process (CPU-Z information, it should actually use Intel Intel 20A and TSMC’s N3B craftsmanship).

The processor comes with 8 Lion Cove performance cores and 16 Skymont high-efficiency cores for a total of 24 cores. The new architecture does not support hyper-threading, which means that a 24-core CPU will have 24 threads.
The processor comes with 36 MB L3, 40 MB L2 and 2.4 MB L1 cache for a total of 76 MB Smart Cache.
The ES version of the processor has a turbo frequency of 5.5 GHz, while the QS version has a turbo frequency of 5.7 GHz. Therefore, after the Intel Core Ultra 9 285K processor is launched, the retail version is expected to have a turbo frequency of 5.7 GHz.
This site attaches the previous Core i9 processor clock frequency speed as follows:
Core Ultra 9 285K - 5.70 GHz (Max)
Core i9-14900KS - 6.20 GHz (Max)
Core i9-14900K - 6.00 GHz (Max)
Core i9-13900KS - 6.00 GHz (Max)
Core i9-13900K - 5.80 GHz (Max)
Core i9-12900KS - 5.50 GHz (Max)
Core i9-12900K - 5.20 GHz (Max)
Performance test results in CineBench R23 In the running score, the multi-threaded running score of the Intel Core Ultra 9 285K processor (QS, 250W) is 43118 points, which is 18% faster than the Intel Core i9-14900K processor (36681 points).

Source: @jaykihn0 In addition, the data also shows that the running score exceeds the default configuration of AMD Ryzen 9 9950X flagship processor, but the default power consumption of the Zen 5 processor is 170W, while the power consumption of the Intel 285K processor is 250W, this comparison is not fair.

GeekBench 5 running score data

CineBench R23 multi-core running score data, the above image source: wccftech

The above is the detailed content of Intel Core Ultra 9 285K processor exposed: CineBench R23 multi-core running score is 18% higher than i9-14900K. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!