range-over-func in Go
Go1.23 has brought the range-over-func feature that was an experiment in go1.22 to be used for real. If anyone has read the sample code, you may have to meditate for a long time. bit Don't do that. P'Yod will explain in a very simple way for you to read
Starting from the spec of For statements with range clause, 3 types of Expressions have been added:
func(func() bool) func(func(V) bool) func(func(K, V) bool)
I would like to add one variable to explain as follows
f func(yield func() bool) f func(yield func(V) bool) f func(yield func(K, V) bool)
The spec says that when we use the function f as an expression in rage, every time we call the yield function there before finishing the function f, we get the result in each loop. Equal to the value we inserted into the yield. I'm still confused when I explain it. Better write code
func main() { for range loop { fmt.Println("-") } } func loop(yield func() bool) { yield() yield() }
output:
- -
If we write code like this, we will get 2 complete loops because we call yield 2 times in f according to the spec, here we name it loop and it will not return anything to us. Because we choose to use a pattern with a yield that doesn't accept any arguments
Another example
func main() { for i := range loop { fmt.Println(i) } } func loop(yield func(int) bool) { yield(3) yield(7) }
output:
3 7
Like this we will get 2 rounds as well because we called yield once and now range will return 2 values which are 3 and 7 which we use to call yield each time
Another example
func main() { for i := range loop { fmt.Println(i) } } func Loop(yield func(int, string) bool) { yield(3, "three") yield(5, "five") yield(7, "seven") }
output:
3 three 5 five 7 seven
We will get 3 loops and get 2 values each time according to the yield we put in each time
And we can also call yield by inserting any type of arguments such as
func loop(yield func(string, bool) bool) { yield("three", true) yield("five", false) yield("seven", false) }
Now that we understand the mechanism of it. When we read difficult examples, we will understand more, such as the example in the Go Wiki: Rangefunc Experiment
package slices func Backward[E any](s []E) func(func(int, E) bool) { return func(yield func(int, E) bool) { for i := len(s)-1; i >= 0; i-- { if !yield(i, s[i]) { return } } } }
main
s := []string{"hello", "world"} for i, x := range slices.Backward(s) { fmt.Println(i, x) }
Easier to read, right? In the end, how to apply it is up to you. We only look at how many times the yield is called. You will only get it when you put it in range
The value that will come out is the value dropped into the yield. That's it. End
The above is the detailed content of range-over-func in Go. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

Notepad++7.3.1
Easy-to-use and free code editor

SublimeText3 Chinese version
Chinese version, very easy to use

Zend Studio 13.0.1
Powerful PHP integrated development environment

Dreamweaver CS6
Visual web development tools

SublimeText3 Mac version
God-level code editing software (SublimeText3)

Hot Topics











Go language performs well in building efficient and scalable systems. Its advantages include: 1. High performance: compiled into machine code, fast running speed; 2. Concurrent programming: simplify multitasking through goroutines and channels; 3. Simplicity: concise syntax, reducing learning and maintenance costs; 4. Cross-platform: supports cross-platform compilation, easy deployment.

Golang is better than Python in terms of performance and scalability. 1) Golang's compilation-type characteristics and efficient concurrency model make it perform well in high concurrency scenarios. 2) Python, as an interpreted language, executes slowly, but can optimize performance through tools such as Cython.

Golang is better than C in concurrency, while C is better than Golang in raw speed. 1) Golang achieves efficient concurrency through goroutine and channel, which is suitable for handling a large number of concurrent tasks. 2)C Through compiler optimization and standard library, it provides high performance close to hardware, suitable for applications that require extreme optimization.

Goimpactsdevelopmentpositivelythroughspeed,efficiency,andsimplicity.1)Speed:Gocompilesquicklyandrunsefficiently,idealforlargeprojects.2)Efficiency:Itscomprehensivestandardlibraryreducesexternaldependencies,enhancingdevelopmentefficiency.3)Simplicity:

Golang and Python each have their own advantages: Golang is suitable for high performance and concurrent programming, while Python is suitable for data science and web development. Golang is known for its concurrency model and efficient performance, while Python is known for its concise syntax and rich library ecosystem.

The performance differences between Golang and C are mainly reflected in memory management, compilation optimization and runtime efficiency. 1) Golang's garbage collection mechanism is convenient but may affect performance, 2) C's manual memory management and compiler optimization are more efficient in recursive computing.

Golang is suitable for rapid development and concurrent scenarios, and C is suitable for scenarios where extreme performance and low-level control are required. 1) Golang improves performance through garbage collection and concurrency mechanisms, and is suitable for high-concurrency Web service development. 2) C achieves the ultimate performance through manual memory management and compiler optimization, and is suitable for embedded system development.

Golang and C each have their own advantages in performance competitions: 1) Golang is suitable for high concurrency and rapid development, and 2) C provides higher performance and fine-grained control. The selection should be based on project requirements and team technology stack.
