


What are the differences between the Composition API used in Vue and the Options API used in Vue ?
The differences between Vue 3.0's Composition API and Vue 2.x's Options API are as follows:
Code Organization:
Composition API: Uses the setup function to centralize the management of a component's state and logic, making the code easier to read and maintain.
Options API: Distributes component state and logic across different options such as data, methods, computed, and watch.
Logic Reuse and Composition:
Composition API: Facilitates easier extraction and reuse of component logic without needing mixins or other abstraction mechanisms.
Options API: Typically requires the use of mixins or higher-order components to reuse logic, which can lead to naming conflicts and tight coupling between components.
Type Support:
Composition API: Being function-based, it integrates more easily with TypeScript (functional programming).
Options API: May require additional type declarations and decorators.
Reactivity Declaration:
Composition API: Explicitly creates reactive state using ref and reactive.
Options API: Reactive state is typically created implicitly within the data option.
Lifecycle Hooks:
Composition API: Lifecycle hooks like onMounted and onUpdated exist as functions within the setup function.
Options API: Lifecycle hooks are defined as component options, such as mounted and updated.
Template Usage:
Composition API: All variables and methods returned by the setup function can be directly used in the template.
Options API: Data and methods in the template need to be defined separately in data, computed, methods, etc.
Dependency Tracking:
Composition API: Provides more granular dependency tracking, where only the actual state in use triggers component updates.
Options API: May cause unnecessary component re-renders in certain scenarios.
Code Splitting and On-Demand Import:
Composition API: Facilitates easier code splitting and on-demand imports since related logic can be more easily organized together.
Options API: Code splitting and on-demand imports are usually more complex and redundant.
Readability and Maintainability:
Composition API: For complex components, it is usually easier to understand and maintain due to the centralized logic.
Options API: For simple components, it may be more intuitive as the API is dispersed.
Community and Ecosystem:
Composition API: As a new feature in Vue 3, it may take time to build an ecosystem around it.
Options API: Already has a mature community and abundant resources.
Both have their advantages and disadvantages, and Vue 3 also supports mixing the two, allowing developers to choose the API that best suits their specific needs.
The above is the detailed content of What are the differences between the Composition API used in Vue and the Options API used in Vue ?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

Notepad++7.3.1
Easy-to-use and free code editor

SublimeText3 Chinese version
Chinese version, very easy to use

Zend Studio 13.0.1
Powerful PHP integrated development environment

Dreamweaver CS6
Visual web development tools

SublimeText3 Mac version
God-level code editing software (SublimeText3)

Hot Topics











JavaScript is the cornerstone of modern web development, and its main functions include event-driven programming, dynamic content generation and asynchronous programming. 1) Event-driven programming allows web pages to change dynamically according to user operations. 2) Dynamic content generation allows page content to be adjusted according to conditions. 3) Asynchronous programming ensures that the user interface is not blocked. JavaScript is widely used in web interaction, single-page application and server-side development, greatly improving the flexibility of user experience and cross-platform development.

The latest trends in JavaScript include the rise of TypeScript, the popularity of modern frameworks and libraries, and the application of WebAssembly. Future prospects cover more powerful type systems, the development of server-side JavaScript, the expansion of artificial intelligence and machine learning, and the potential of IoT and edge computing.

Different JavaScript engines have different effects when parsing and executing JavaScript code, because the implementation principles and optimization strategies of each engine differ. 1. Lexical analysis: convert source code into lexical unit. 2. Grammar analysis: Generate an abstract syntax tree. 3. Optimization and compilation: Generate machine code through the JIT compiler. 4. Execute: Run the machine code. V8 engine optimizes through instant compilation and hidden class, SpiderMonkey uses a type inference system, resulting in different performance performance on the same code.

Python is more suitable for beginners, with a smooth learning curve and concise syntax; JavaScript is suitable for front-end development, with a steep learning curve and flexible syntax. 1. Python syntax is intuitive and suitable for data science and back-end development. 2. JavaScript is flexible and widely used in front-end and server-side programming.

JavaScript is the core language of modern web development and is widely used for its diversity and flexibility. 1) Front-end development: build dynamic web pages and single-page applications through DOM operations and modern frameworks (such as React, Vue.js, Angular). 2) Server-side development: Node.js uses a non-blocking I/O model to handle high concurrency and real-time applications. 3) Mobile and desktop application development: cross-platform development is realized through ReactNative and Electron to improve development efficiency.

This article demonstrates frontend integration with a backend secured by Permit, building a functional EdTech SaaS application using Next.js. The frontend fetches user permissions to control UI visibility and ensures API requests adhere to role-base

I built a functional multi-tenant SaaS application (an EdTech app) with your everyday tech tool and you can do the same. First, what’s a multi-tenant SaaS application? Multi-tenant SaaS applications let you serve multiple customers from a sing

The shift from C/C to JavaScript requires adapting to dynamic typing, garbage collection and asynchronous programming. 1) C/C is a statically typed language that requires manual memory management, while JavaScript is dynamically typed and garbage collection is automatically processed. 2) C/C needs to be compiled into machine code, while JavaScript is an interpreted language. 3) JavaScript introduces concepts such as closures, prototype chains and Promise, which enhances flexibility and asynchronous programming capabilities.
