Understanding OLTP and Choosing the Right Database

了解 OLTP 並為您的事務工作負載選擇正確的資料庫

OLTP（線上事務處理）簡介

線上事務處理（OLTP）是指設計用於管理以事務為導向的應用程式的一類系統。這些應用程式的典型特點是頻繁、即時的資料輸入和檢索操作。 OLTP 系統的範例包括電子商務平台、金融服務、訂票系統等。 OLTP 系統需要能夠處理大容量查詢的資料庫，即使在數百或數千個事務同時發生的情況下也能確保資料的一致性和可靠性。

OLTP 資料庫對於此類系統至關重要，因為它支援快速建立、讀取、更新和刪除 (CRUD) 記錄。資料庫必須確保 ACID（原子性、一致性、隔離性、持久性）合規性，才能在不遺失資料完整性的情況下處理這些操作。

在本部落格中，我們將探討如何選擇正確的 OLTP 資料庫、開源生態系統中可用的選項及其優缺點。

選擇 OLTP 資料庫時要考慮的關鍵因素

選擇正確的 OLTP 資料庫對於任何企業來說都是一個關鍵決策，因為它會影響效能、可擴展性和資料完整性。以下是一些需要考慮的因素：

1. ACID Compliance

• What It Means: OLTP databases must follow ACID principles to ensure reliable transaction processing.
  • Atomicity: Ensures that all parts of a transaction are treated as a single unit (either fully completed or rolled back).
  • Consistency: Guarantees that the database remains in a valid state before and after a transaction.
  • Isolation: Ensures that concurrent transactions do not affect each other.
  • Durability: Ensures that once a transaction is committed, it is saved permanently, even in the case of a system failure.
• Why It Matters: Any violation of ACID principles can lead to data corruption, loss of data integrity, or inconsistent results, which can be critical in OLTP applications like banking or retail.

2. Performance

• What It Means: The ability of the database to handle a high number of transactions per second (TPS) while maintaining low latency.
• Why It Matters: High-performance databases are crucial for applications requiring real-time data processing like point-of-sale systems, online payments, and customer management systems.

3. Scalability

• What It Means: The database's ability to grow as the data and transaction load increases.
  • Vertical Scalability: Adding more power (CPU, RAM, etc.) to the existing server.
  • Horizontal Scalability: Distributing data across multiple servers.
• Why It Matters: As businesses grow, so do the volume and complexity of transactions. Your database should scale accordingly to maintain performance without major redesigns.

4. Data Integrity and Security

• What It Means: Ensuring that the data remains accurate and protected against unauthorized access or corruption.
• Why It Matters: Transactional databases often contain sensitive information like financial records, personal details, or inventory data, so ensuring data integrity and security is critical for maintaining trust and compliance.

5. Ease of Maintenance

• What It Means: The database should be easy to set up, maintain, and upgrade.
• Why It Matters: Complex database systems can lead to costly maintenance and operational downtime, which can severely impact business operations.

6. Cost

• What It Means: The cost associated with licensing, deploying, and maintaining the database.
• Why It Matters: For many businesses, especially startups or small enterprises, keeping costs down is essential. Open-source databases provide a cost-effective option compared to commercial solutions.

Top Open-Source OLTP Databases

There are many open-source databases that have gained popularity for their robust performance and scalability in OLTP systems. Let's discuss some of the best open-source options, their pros and cons.

1. PostgreSQL

Overview: PostgreSQL is one of the most popular open-source relational databases. Known for its robustness and extensibility, PostgreSQL supports advanced features such as JSON storage, custom data types, and indexing.

Pros:

• ACID Compliance: Fully supports ACID transactions, ensuring data integrity in OLTP systems.
• Performance: It has excellent performance in transactional workloads, with support for both vertical and horizontal scalability through clustering.
• Extensibility: You can add custom functions, data types, and extensions like PostGIS (for geographic data).
• Community Support: Strong community and regular updates with new features.

Cons:

• Complexity: PostgreSQL can be complex to configure and tune, especially for larger, high-performance systems.
• Horizontal Scaling: While PostgreSQL supports scaling, it is not as seamless as some NoSQL databases or distributed relational databases.

Best Use Cases: Banking systems, financial applications, SaaS platforms, CRM systems.

2. MySQL / MariaDB

概述：MySQL是另一个著名的开源关系数据库。 MariaDB 是 MySQL 的一个分支，由于其开源友好的性质和性能改进而越来越受欢迎。

优点：

• ACID 合规性：MySQL（使用 InnoDB 存储引擎）和 MariaDB 完全支持 ACID 事务，使其成为 OLTP 工作负载的理想选择。
• 广泛采用：非常受欢迎，拥有庞大的用户群和社区。
• 性能：MySQL 快速且轻量级，特别是在读取繁重的 OLTP 环境中。
• 低成本：两者都是免费且开源的，这使得小型企业和初创公司负担得起。

缺点：

• 有限的高级功能：MySQL 缺乏 PostgreSQL 中的一些更高级的功能，例如更丰富的索引和对更复杂数据类型的本机支持。
• 分片和复制：与某些分布式数据库相比，实现水平扩展或分片更加复杂。

最佳用例：电子商务平台、内容管理系统和简单的金融应用程序。

3. CockroachDB

概述：CockroachDB 是一个开源分布式 SQL 数据库，专为高可用性和水平扩展而设计。它为分布式事务提供了强大的 ACID 保证。

优点：

• 分布式设计：自动跨节点分片数据，方便水平扩展。
• 弹性：旨在以最短的停机时间承受节点故障。
• ACID 合规性：支持完全符合 ACID 的分布式事务。
• 云原生：针对云部署和多区域应用程序进行了优化。

缺点：

• 年轻的生态系统：与 PostgreSQL 和 MySQL 相比，CockroachDB 相对较新，这意味着第三方集成和社区资源可能较少。
• 复杂性：与传统关系数据库相比，设置更复杂。

最佳用例：全球事务系统、分布式应用程序和云原生服务。

4. MongoDB（支持事务）

概述：MongoDB 是一个 NoSQL 数据库，在其后续版本（从 4.0 版本开始）增加了对多文档 ACID 事务的支持。这使其成为某些 OLTP 用例的候选者。

优点：

• 灵活性：处理非结构化或半结构化数据，使其对于数据模型可能随时间演变的场景非常有用。
• 水平可扩展性：MongoDB 是为水平扩展和分片而构建的。
• 高性能：非常适合读取密集型应用程序和某些写入密集型工作负载。

缺点：

• 复杂事务：虽然 MongoDB 支持 ACID 事务，但与传统 SQL 数据库相比，它对于复杂事务工作流程来说并不健壮或高效。
• 一致性问题：MongoDB经常为了性能和可扩展性而牺牲一致性，这可能并不适合所有OLTP场景。

最佳用例：具有灵活架构要求或部分 OLTP 工作负载的应用程序，例如电子商务目录或内容管理系统。

流行开源 OLTP 数据库比较

Database	ACID Compliance	Performance	Scalability	Ease of Use	Best Use Cases
PostgreSQL	Full	High	Vertical/Horizontal	Moderate	Financial systems, CRM, ERP
MySQL/MariaDB	Full (InnoDB engine)	High	Vertical	Easy	E-commerce, CMS, small to medium systems
CockroachDB	Full	High	Horizontal	Moderate	Distributed/global systems, cloud-native apps
MongoDB	Partial	Moderate-High	Horizontal	Easy	Applications with flexible schemas, semi-OLTP

数据库 ACID 合规性 性能 可扩展性 易于使用 最佳用例 标题> PostgreSQL 完整 高 垂直/水平 中等 财务系统、CRM、ERP MySQL/MariaDB 完整（InnoDB引擎） 高 垂直 简单 电子商务、CMS、中小型系统 CockroachDB 完整 高 水平 中等 分布式/全球系统、云原生应用 MongoDB 部分 中高 水平 简单 具有灵活模式、半OLTP的应用程序 表>

Conclusion

Choosing the right OLTP database depends on your application's specific needs, including transaction volume, performance requirements, scalability, and data structure. Open-source databases like PostgreSQL, MySQL/MariaDB, CockroachDB, and MongoDB offer excellent options for handling transactional workloads, with each providing its own strengths and trade-offs.

If you need advanced features and strong ACID compliance, PostgreSQL is an excellent choice. For simpler applications with high read/write needs, MySQL/MariaDB can be a solid, cost-effective option. For globally distributed applications, CockroachDB offers cutting-edge capabilities in horizontal scaling and resilience. MongoDB, while more suited to NoSQL use cases, has emerged as a flexible choice for applications that require both transactional support and schema flexibility.

Ultimately, understanding the unique needs of your application will guide you toward the best database for your OLTP workloads.

Each platform is powerful in its own right, and the best choice ultimately depends on your specific use cases, team expertise, and long-term data strategy.

If you have any questions or experiences to share about working with these different types of OLTP DBs, tell me which one is your favorite to implement and for what kind of data, feel free to drop a comment below!
Looking to supercharge your team with a seasoned Data Engineer? Let’s connect on LinkedIn or drop me a message — I’d love to explore how I can help drive your data success!

The above is the detailed content of Understanding OLTP and Choosing the Right Database. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!