Why Does \'bytes(n)\' in Python Produce Byte Strings Instead of Binary Integers?

Understanding the Curious Behavior of "bytes(n)" in Python

In Python 3, the "bytes(n)" function generates a byte string of length "n" rather than converting "n" to a binary representation. This seemingly peculiar behavior has sparked confusion among Python developers.

To comprehend this behavior, let's delve into the history of the function. Prior to Python 3.2, "bytes(n)" created a sequence of zero bytes. This allowed for easy creation of fixed-length byte arrays, often used for networking or data structures. However, as Python 3 evolved, the focus shifted to object-oriented design. As a result, the "bytes" object was introduced, offering a range of methods and operations specifically tailored for handling binary data.

With the introduction of the "bytes" object, the behavior of "bytes(n)" was redefined. It now allocated a sequence of bytes initialized to zero values. This change was made to align with the object-oriented approach, providing a consistent and intuitive interface for working with binary data.

Alternatively, if the intent is to convert an integer to a binary representation, the "to_bytes" method can be employed. This method returns a byte representation of the integer, offering greater control over byte order and signedness. For example:

<code class="python">(1024).to_bytes(2, byteorder='big')</code>

This code snippet returns the byte equivalent of the integer 1024, in big-endian format:

<code class="python">b'\x04\x00'</code>

For signed integers, the "to_bytes" method provides an additional parameter, "signed," which specifies the signedness of the binary representation.

The above is the detailed content of Why Does \'bytes(n)\' in Python Produce Byte Strings Instead of Binary Integers?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!