When working on a Symfony2 application, developers often face architectural challenges regarding bundle organization. Two common questions arise:
Traditionally, one might create distinct bundles for frontend and backend elements, known as "FrontendBundle" and "BackendBundle." However, having all-encompassing bundles that contain both frontend and backend code is another option. This approach avoids the need for multiple sub-bundles, simplifies the codebase, and eliminates arbitrary decisions about which bundle to use for specific functionality.
For reusable code elements shared across multiple bundles, such as date displayers or paginators, it's recommended to create a dedicated "CommonBundle." This bundle provides a centralized repository for common functions, templates, and other assets, promoting code reuse and consistency.
A newer approach advocates for a single, app-specific bundle named "AppBundle" instead of numerous specialized bundles. This simplifies development and eliminates the need for complex decisions regarding bundle organization. By using subnamespaces within AppBundle, code can be logically partitioned without creating separate bundles.
The best approach for bundle organization depends on the specific project's requirements. However, the recommended strategies discussed above provide a framework for structuring Symfony2 applications efficiently and optimizing code reuse.
The above is the detailed content of When to Use General vs. Specific Bundles for Symfony2 Application Organization?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!