When is a User-Defined Copy Constructor Necessary?
The C compiler automatically generates a copy constructor for classes, which performs member-wise copying by default. However, in certain situations, we may need to define our own user-defined copy constructor.
Reasons for Defining a User-Defined Copy Constructor:
Examples:
Consider the following class that stores a character string:
<code class="cpp">class Class { public: Class(const char* str); ~Class(); private: char* stored; };</code>
With the default copy constructor, the stored member would only be copied by reference, leading to undefined behavior when one of the copies is destroyed. To prevent this, we define a user-defined copy constructor that performs deep copying:
<code class="cpp">Class::Class(const Class& another) { stored = new char[strlen(another.stored) + 1]; strcpy(stored, another.stored); }</code>
Furthermore, a user-defined copy constructor is also required for the assignment operator to perform deep copying correctly:
<code class="cpp">void Class::operator = (const Class& another) { char* temp = new char[strlen(another.stored) + 1]; strcpy(temp, another.stored); delete[] stored; stored = temp; }</code>
The above is the detailed content of When Should You Implement a User-Defined Copy Constructor in C ?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!