Question: Despite BIGINT seemingly being MySQL's largest integer type, what's the solution for storing even larger integers, say a BIGINT(80)? Additionally, why do certain sources, such as Twitter's API documentation, advise storing these massive integers as varchar? Which factors influence the choice between these data types?
Answer:
Counterintuitively, the 64-bit size limits of big integers (rather than a specific digit count of 20) determine their actual boundary. Any number exceeding this 64-bit limit will not fit within a big integer.
This limitation arises from the fact that native integers are optimized for lightning-fast manipulation by hardware, while textual representations of numbers typically necessitate a sequential digit-by-digit processing approach.
Should you encounter numbers exceeding the 64-bit limit, you can opt for varchar storage. However, this approach comes with a caveat: extensive mathematical operations on these stored numbers may not be feasible.
Alternatively, you could explore:
The above is the detailed content of How to Handle Massive Integers Beyond MySQL\'s BIGINT Limit: Varchar vs. Other Options?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!