


How to Pass Nested Structures by Reference in Reflection and Set Default Values Recursively?
Passing Nested Structures by Reference through Reflection
Traversing and modifying nested structures through reflection allows for dynamic manipulation of data. However, when encountering a struct field that is itself a struct, setting values using reflection can lead to a "reflect.Value.Set using unaddressable value" panic.
Understanding the Issue
The root of the problem lies in the way reflection handles nested structures. By default, structs are passed by value, which means when we retrieve the Value from a nested struct field for modification, we are operating on a copy of the data rather than the original. Any changes made affect only the copy, not the actual structure.
Solution: Passing by Reference
To set field values of a nested struct, it is necessary to pass it as a pointer. This can be achieved using the Value.Addr() method, which returns a pointer to the actual struct value.
Recursive Default Value Setting
The recursion in the sample code reflects the need to traverse all fields of a struct and its nested structs. To set default values, we call setDefaultValue on the pointer value of each field. For primitive types (int, string, bool), the default values are hardcoded. For nested structs, setDefaultValue is called recursively to handle their fields.
Working Example
Consider the following sample code:
<code class="go">type Client struct { Id int Age int PrimaryContact Contact Name string } type Contact struct { Id int ClientId int IsPrimary bool Email string } func SetDefault(s interface{}) error { return setDefaultValue(reflect.ValueOf(s)) } func setDefaultValue(v reflect.Value) error { if v.Kind() != reflect.Ptr { return errors.New("Not a pointer value") } v = reflect.Indirect(v) switch v.Kind() { case reflect.Int: v.SetInt(42) case reflect.String: v.SetString("Foo") case reflect.Bool: v.SetBool(true) case reflect.Struct: // Iterate over the struct fields for i := 0; i < v.NumField(); i++ { err := setDefaultValue(v.Field(i).Addr()) if err != nil { return err } } default: return errors.New("Unsupported kind: " + v.Kind().String()) } return nil } func main() { a := Client{} err := SetDefault(&a) if err != nil { fmt.Println("Error: ", err) } else { fmt.Printf("%+v\n", a) } }</code>
Output:
{Id:42 Age:42 PrimaryContact:{Id:42 ClientId:42 IsPrimary:true Email:Foo} Name:Foo}
This example showcases how to pass a nested structure by reference through reflection, setting default values using recursion.
The above is the detailed content of How to Pass Nested Structures by Reference in Reflection and Set Default Values Recursively?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

Notepad++7.3.1
Easy-to-use and free code editor

SublimeText3 Chinese version
Chinese version, very easy to use

Zend Studio 13.0.1
Powerful PHP integrated development environment

Dreamweaver CS6
Visual web development tools

SublimeText3 Mac version
God-level code editing software (SublimeText3)

Hot Topics











Go language performs well in building efficient and scalable systems. Its advantages include: 1. High performance: compiled into machine code, fast running speed; 2. Concurrent programming: simplify multitasking through goroutines and channels; 3. Simplicity: concise syntax, reducing learning and maintenance costs; 4. Cross-platform: supports cross-platform compilation, easy deployment.

Golang is better than Python in terms of performance and scalability. 1) Golang's compilation-type characteristics and efficient concurrency model make it perform well in high concurrency scenarios. 2) Python, as an interpreted language, executes slowly, but can optimize performance through tools such as Cython.

Golang is better than C in concurrency, while C is better than Golang in raw speed. 1) Golang achieves efficient concurrency through goroutine and channel, which is suitable for handling a large number of concurrent tasks. 2)C Through compiler optimization and standard library, it provides high performance close to hardware, suitable for applications that require extreme optimization.

Goimpactsdevelopmentpositivelythroughspeed,efficiency,andsimplicity.1)Speed:Gocompilesquicklyandrunsefficiently,idealforlargeprojects.2)Efficiency:Itscomprehensivestandardlibraryreducesexternaldependencies,enhancingdevelopmentefficiency.3)Simplicity:

Golang and Python each have their own advantages: Golang is suitable for high performance and concurrent programming, while Python is suitable for data science and web development. Golang is known for its concurrency model and efficient performance, while Python is known for its concise syntax and rich library ecosystem.

The performance differences between Golang and C are mainly reflected in memory management, compilation optimization and runtime efficiency. 1) Golang's garbage collection mechanism is convenient but may affect performance, 2) C's manual memory management and compiler optimization are more efficient in recursive computing.

Golang and C each have their own advantages in performance competitions: 1) Golang is suitable for high concurrency and rapid development, and 2) C provides higher performance and fine-grained control. The selection should be based on project requirements and team technology stack.

Golang is suitable for rapid development and concurrent scenarios, and C is suitable for scenarios where extreme performance and low-level control are required. 1) Golang improves performance through garbage collection and concurrency mechanisms, and is suitable for high-concurrency Web service development. 2) C achieves the ultimate performance through manual memory management and compiler optimization, and is suitable for embedded system development.
