Comparing "Generic" Types in C and Java
Java and C both incorporate mechanisms for handling generic types. While these features share similarities, there are distinct differences between them.
Key Distinction: Type Specification
In C , generic types do not require specifying a class or interface. This flexibility allows for the creation of truly generic functions and classes with looser typing. For example, the following C function can add objects of any type with the " " operator:
<code class="cpp">template <typename T> T sum(T a, T b) { return a + b; }</code>
In Java, on the other hand, generic types require specifying a type to invoke methods on passed objects. This restriction ensures type safety but limits their flexibility:
<code class="java"><T extends Something> T sum(T a, T b) { return a.add ( b ); }</code>
Code Generation and Optimization
In C , generic functions and classes are defined in headers, as the compiler generates different functions for different types. This process incurs a performance overhead during compilation.
In Java, the compilation is less affected by generics, as it employs a technique called "erasure" at runtime. This means that generic types are effectively removed, resulting in the following call:
<code class="java">Something sum(Something a, Something b) { return a.add ( b ); }</code>
Implications
The choice between C and Java generics depends on specific requirements.
The above is the detailed content of What Are the Differences Between C and Java Generics?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!