## Which is Faster in MySQL: `LIKE` or `LOCATE` for String Matching?
Which One Is Faster: MySQL LIKE vs LOCATE?
In MySQL, there are two commonly used functions for pattern matching in strings: LIKE and LOCATE. While both functions can be used to search for substrings within a string, they differ in their approach and performance characteristics.
LIKE vs LOCATE
The LIKE operator uses wildcards to match patterns of characters. It supports various wildcard characters, including % (matches any number of characters) and _ (matches a single character). For example:
<code class="sql">SELECT * FROM table WHERE column LIKE '%text%';</code>
This query searches for all rows where the column value contains the string "text" anywhere within it.
On the other hand, the LOCATE function searches for the position of a specified substring within a string. It returns the index of the first occurrence of the substring, or 0 if the substring is not found. For example:
<code class="sql">SELECT * FROM table WHERE LOCATE('text', column) > 0;</code>
This query searches for all rows where the column value contains the substring "text" anywhere within it.
Performance Comparison
In general, the LIKE operator is marginally faster than LOCATE. This is because LIKE does not have to perform an additional comparison to check if the result is greater than 0.
To demonstrate this difference in performance, consider the following benchmarks:
<code class="sql">mysql> SELECT BENCHMARK(100000000,LOCATE('foo','foobar')); +---------------------------------------------+ | BENCHMARK(100000000,LOCATE('foo','foobar')) | +---------------------------------------------+ | 0 | +---------------------------------------------+ 1 row in set (3.24 sec) mysql> SELECT BENCHMARK(100000000,LOCATE('foo','foobar') > 0); +-------------------------------------------------+ | BENCHMARK(100000000,LOCATE('foo','foobar') > 0) | +-------------------------------------------------+ | 0 | +-------------------------------------------------+ 1 row in set (4.63 sec) mysql> SELECT BENCHMARK(100000000,'foobar' LIKE '%foo%'); +--------------------------------------------+ | BENCHMARK(100000000,'foobar' LIKE '%foo%') | +--------------------------------------------+ | 0 | +--------------------------------------------+ 1 row in set (4.28 sec)</code>
As the benchmark results show, LIKE is marginally faster than LOCATE when searching for a substring within a string. However, the difference in performance is relatively small for most practical use cases.
The above is the detailed content of ## Which is Faster in MySQL: `LIKE` or `LOCATE` for String Matching?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

AI Hentai Generator
Generate AI Hentai for free.

Hot Article

Hot Tools

Notepad++7.3.1
Easy-to-use and free code editor

SublimeText3 Chinese version
Chinese version, very easy to use

Zend Studio 13.0.1
Powerful PHP integrated development environment

Dreamweaver CS6
Visual web development tools

SublimeText3 Mac version
God-level code editing software (SublimeText3)

Hot Topics



The article discusses using MySQL's ALTER TABLE statement to modify tables, including adding/dropping columns, renaming tables/columns, and changing column data types.

Article discusses configuring SSL/TLS encryption for MySQL, including certificate generation and verification. Main issue is using self-signed certificates' security implications.[Character count: 159]

Article discusses popular MySQL GUI tools like MySQL Workbench and phpMyAdmin, comparing their features and suitability for beginners and advanced users.[159 characters]

Article discusses strategies for handling large datasets in MySQL, including partitioning, sharding, indexing, and query optimization.

InnoDB's full-text search capabilities are very powerful, which can significantly improve database query efficiency and ability to process large amounts of text data. 1) InnoDB implements full-text search through inverted indexing, supporting basic and advanced search queries. 2) Use MATCH and AGAINST keywords to search, support Boolean mode and phrase search. 3) Optimization methods include using word segmentation technology, periodic rebuilding of indexes and adjusting cache size to improve performance and accuracy.

The article discusses dropping tables in MySQL using the DROP TABLE statement, emphasizing precautions and risks. It highlights that the action is irreversible without backups, detailing recovery methods and potential production environment hazards.

Article discusses using foreign keys to represent relationships in databases, focusing on best practices, data integrity, and common pitfalls to avoid.

The article discusses creating indexes on JSON columns in various databases like PostgreSQL, MySQL, and MongoDB to enhance query performance. It explains the syntax and benefits of indexing specific JSON paths, and lists supported database systems.
