


**Does Go\'s Interface Representation Show the Underlying Type or Just the Interface Type?**
In-Depth Analysis of Interface Representation in Go
In the world of Go programming, understanding the intricate details of interface representations is paramount. Two articles have sparked confusion regarding this subject, leaving developers seeking clarity.
Question:
An apparent contradiction arises between two articles discussing interface representation. One article suggests that the type of an interface variable reflects the entire type of the underlying value, while the other claims that it only shows the interface type. This discrepancy creates a dilemma.
Answer:
The seemingly contradictory nature of the articles stems from their focus on different aspects of interface representation. The first article, "Laws of Reflection," explains the representation at the reflection level, while the second article delves into the dynamic dispatch properties of interfaces at runtime.
Reflection-Level Representation:
According to the "Laws of Reflection," an interface variable contains a (value, type) pair. In the example provided, the interface variable r of type io.Reader stores the value tty, which has the underlying type *os.File. This is because the underlying type of the value is still accessible through the interface variable, even though it only exposes the interface methods.
Runtime Representation:
In contrast, the second article examines the dynamic dispatch mechanisms of interfaces at runtime. It explains that at runtime, an interface variable holds a "wrapper object" that provides information about the underlying object's layout. This wrapper object, known as the itable, contains references to the implemented methods.
Reconciling the Two Perspectives:
The apparent contradiction resolves when we recognize that these two perspectives complement each other. At the reflection level, we get an overview of the interface and the underlying value, while at runtime, we delve into the dynamic behavior of the interface.
Key Points:
- Interface variables contain a (value, type) pair at the reflection level.
- At runtime, interfaces use a wrapper object (itable) to facilitate dynamic dispatch.
- The type of an interface variable reflects the static interface type, while the underlying value carries its full type information.
The above is the detailed content of **Does Go\'s Interface Representation Show the Underlying Type or Just the Interface Type?**. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

Notepad++7.3.1
Easy-to-use and free code editor

SublimeText3 Chinese version
Chinese version, very easy to use

Zend Studio 13.0.1
Powerful PHP integrated development environment

Dreamweaver CS6
Visual web development tools

SublimeText3 Mac version
God-level code editing software (SublimeText3)

Hot Topics











Go language performs well in building efficient and scalable systems. Its advantages include: 1. High performance: compiled into machine code, fast running speed; 2. Concurrent programming: simplify multitasking through goroutines and channels; 3. Simplicity: concise syntax, reducing learning and maintenance costs; 4. Cross-platform: supports cross-platform compilation, easy deployment.

Golang is better than Python in terms of performance and scalability. 1) Golang's compilation-type characteristics and efficient concurrency model make it perform well in high concurrency scenarios. 2) Python, as an interpreted language, executes slowly, but can optimize performance through tools such as Cython.

Golang is better than C in concurrency, while C is better than Golang in raw speed. 1) Golang achieves efficient concurrency through goroutine and channel, which is suitable for handling a large number of concurrent tasks. 2)C Through compiler optimization and standard library, it provides high performance close to hardware, suitable for applications that require extreme optimization.

Goimpactsdevelopmentpositivelythroughspeed,efficiency,andsimplicity.1)Speed:Gocompilesquicklyandrunsefficiently,idealforlargeprojects.2)Efficiency:Itscomprehensivestandardlibraryreducesexternaldependencies,enhancingdevelopmentefficiency.3)Simplicity:

Golang and Python each have their own advantages: Golang is suitable for high performance and concurrent programming, while Python is suitable for data science and web development. Golang is known for its concurrency model and efficient performance, while Python is known for its concise syntax and rich library ecosystem.

The performance differences between Golang and C are mainly reflected in memory management, compilation optimization and runtime efficiency. 1) Golang's garbage collection mechanism is convenient but may affect performance, 2) C's manual memory management and compiler optimization are more efficient in recursive computing.

Golang is suitable for rapid development and concurrent scenarios, and C is suitable for scenarios where extreme performance and low-level control are required. 1) Golang improves performance through garbage collection and concurrency mechanisms, and is suitable for high-concurrency Web service development. 2) C achieves the ultimate performance through manual memory management and compiler optimization, and is suitable for embedded system development.

Golang and C each have their own advantages in performance competitions: 1) Golang is suitable for high concurrency and rapid development, and 2) C provides higher performance and fine-grained control. The selection should be based on project requirements and team technology stack.
