Why Does Using a Range-Based For Loop on `std::vector` Cause an Error?

Understanding Range-for-Loops and std::vector

In C , range-based for loops simplify the iteration over containers. However, unexpected behavior can arise when attempting to use these loops with certain container types, such as std::vector.

Consider the following code snippet:

<code class="cpp">std::vector<int> intVector(10);
for(auto& i : intVector)
    std::cout << i;</code>

This code iterates over the intVector collection and prints each element. However, replace intVector with a std::vector boolVector:

<code class="cpp">std::vector<bool> boolVector(10);
for(auto& i : boolVector)
    std::cout << i;</code>

This modified code results in an error:

error: invalid initialization of non-const reference of type ‘std::_Bit_reference&’ from an rvalue of type ‘std::_Bit_iterator::reference {aka std::_Bit_reference}’

Underlying Mechanism:

The discrepancy arises because std::vector operates differently from other vector types. In most std::vector variations, iterators point to references of the element type, allowing for direct access and modification via auto&. However, this is not the case for std::vector.

std::vector stores boolean values efficiently by packing them into integers. As a result, iterators return a special proxy object that performs bit manipulation to retrieve the boolean value. This proxy is an rvalue (temporary), which cannot be bound to an lvalue reference (auto&).

Solution:

To resolve this, use auto&&& in the range-based loop:

<code class="cpp">for(auto&& i : boolVector)
    std::cout << i;</code>

The auto&&& syntax checks the type of the iterator reference. If it's an lvalue reference, it remains the same; otherwise, it binds to and preserves the temporary proxy, allowing the code to execute correctly.

The above is the detailed content of Why Does Using a Range-Based For Loop on `std::vector` Cause an Error?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!