Why does using the OR operator in pandas indexing retain rows with -1 values, while the AND operator discards them, contradicting intuitive expectations?

Susan Sarandon
Release: 2024-10-26 05:47:31
Original
891 people have browsed it

Why does using the OR operator in pandas indexing retain rows with -1 values, while the AND operator discards them, contradicting intuitive expectations?

pandas: Multiple Conditions While Indexing a Data Frame - Non-Intuitive Behavior

When selecting rows from a data frame based on conditions involving multiple columns, users might encounter unexpected behavior. In particular, the OR and AND operators seem to behave conversely to their expected roles.

Consider the following code:

<code class="python">import pandas as pd

df = pd.DataFrame({'a': range(5), 'b': range(5) })

# Insert -1 values
df.loc[1, 'a'] = -1
df.loc[1, 'b'] = -1
df.loc[3, 'a'] = -1
df.loc[4, 'b'] = -1

df1 = df[(df.a != -1) & (df.b != -1)]
df2 = df[(df.a != -1) | (df.b != -1)]

df_combined = pd.concat([df, df1, df2], axis=1, keys=['Original', 'AND', 'OR'])

print(df_combined)</code>
Copy after login

Results:

<code class="python">   Original  AND  OR
    a  b  a  b  a  b
0   0  0  0  0  0  0
1  -1 -1  NaN NaN  NaN NaN
2   2  2  2  2  2  2
3  -1  3  NaN NaN -1  3
4   4 -1  NaN NaN  4 -1</code>
Copy after login

As observed, rows where one or both values are -1 are retained when the OR operator is used (df2), while rows with any -1 value are discarded when the AND operator is used (df1). This behavior contradicts intuitive expectations.

Explanation

The seemingly reversed behavior stems from the perspective adopted in each operator's condition. For the AND operator:

<code class="python">(df.a != -1) & (df.b != -1)</code>
Copy after login

The condition reads as "keep rows where both df.a and df.b differ from -1," effectively excluding rows with at least one -1 value.

Conversely, the OR operator:

<code class="python">(df.a != -1) | (df.b != -1)</code>
Copy after login

Reads as "keep rows where either df.a or df.b differs from -1," effectively excluding rows where both values are -1.

Thus, the behavior aligns with the intention of selecting rows to retain, rather than those to exclude.

Note on Chained Access

The code snippet df['a'][1] = -1 for modifying cell values is not advisable. For clarity and consistency, it is recommended to use df.loc[1, 'a'] = -1 or df.iloc[1, 0] = -1 instead.

The above is the detailed content of Why does using the OR operator in pandas indexing retain rows with -1 values, while the AND operator discards them, contradicting intuitive expectations?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

source:php.cn
Statement of this Website
The content of this article is voluntarily contributed by netizens, and the copyright belongs to the original author. This site does not assume corresponding legal responsibility. If you find any content suspected of plagiarism or infringement, please contact admin@php.cn
Latest Articles by Author
Popular Tutorials
More>
Latest Downloads
More>
Web Effects
Website Source Code
Website Materials
Front End Template
About us Disclaimer Sitemap
php.cn:Public welfare online PHP training,Help PHP learners grow quickly!