


How Can You Store Workflows with Diverse Node Types in MongoDB using Mgo (Go)?
Interface as Model in Mgo (Go): Resolving the Assignability Error
When dealing with workflows comprising nodes of varying types, it may be tempting to leverage Golang interfaces to encapsulate their diverse behaviors. However, storing such workflows in MongoDB poses a unique challenge.
The Assignability Issue
The error encountered during the Find operation stems from the incompatibility between the decoded document and the Node interface. Mgo lacks the type information necessary to determine the specific type of each embedded node. This results in an assignment mismatch.
Alternative Approach: Embedding with Type Information
To overcome this hurdle, consider encapsulating the type information within the embedded nodes. Define a new struct, NodeWithType, which consists of the Node interface and a Type field representing the specific type.
<code class="go">type NodeWithType struct { Node Node `bson:"-"` Type string }</code>
Custom BSON Unmarshaling
To bridge the gap between the decoded document and the Go struct, implement the SetBSON function for NodeWithType. This function will decode the Type field, create an instance of the corresponding type, and delegate the unmarshaling to it.
<code class="go">func (nt *NodeWithType) SetBSON(r bson.Raw) error { // Decode Type field var typeName string err := bson.Unmarshal(r["Type"], &typeName) if err != nil { return err } // Create an instance of the correct type based on Type field var node Node switch typeName { case "EmailNode": node = &EmailNode{} case "TwitterNode": node = &TwitterNode{} } // Unmarshal the remaining fields into the created instance if err = node.SetBSON(r[typeName]); err != nil { return err } // Assign the created instance to the Node field nt.Node = node return nil }</code>
In the Workflow struct, replace the Node slice with a slice of NodeWithType.
<code class="go">type Workflow struct { CreatedAt time.Time StartedAt time.Time CreatedBy string Nodes []NodeWithType }</code>
With this approach, Mgo can now successfully find and unmarshal workflows with embedded nodes of different types.
The above is the detailed content of How Can You Store Workflows with Diverse Node Types in MongoDB using Mgo (Go)?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

Notepad++7.3.1
Easy-to-use and free code editor

SublimeText3 Chinese version
Chinese version, very easy to use

Zend Studio 13.0.1
Powerful PHP integrated development environment

Dreamweaver CS6
Visual web development tools

SublimeText3 Mac version
God-level code editing software (SublimeText3)

Hot Topics











Go language performs well in building efficient and scalable systems. Its advantages include: 1. High performance: compiled into machine code, fast running speed; 2. Concurrent programming: simplify multitasking through goroutines and channels; 3. Simplicity: concise syntax, reducing learning and maintenance costs; 4. Cross-platform: supports cross-platform compilation, easy deployment.

Golang is better than Python in terms of performance and scalability. 1) Golang's compilation-type characteristics and efficient concurrency model make it perform well in high concurrency scenarios. 2) Python, as an interpreted language, executes slowly, but can optimize performance through tools such as Cython.

Golang is better than C in concurrency, while C is better than Golang in raw speed. 1) Golang achieves efficient concurrency through goroutine and channel, which is suitable for handling a large number of concurrent tasks. 2)C Through compiler optimization and standard library, it provides high performance close to hardware, suitable for applications that require extreme optimization.

Goimpactsdevelopmentpositivelythroughspeed,efficiency,andsimplicity.1)Speed:Gocompilesquicklyandrunsefficiently,idealforlargeprojects.2)Efficiency:Itscomprehensivestandardlibraryreducesexternaldependencies,enhancingdevelopmentefficiency.3)Simplicity:

Golang and Python each have their own advantages: Golang is suitable for high performance and concurrent programming, while Python is suitable for data science and web development. Golang is known for its concurrency model and efficient performance, while Python is known for its concise syntax and rich library ecosystem.

Golang is suitable for rapid development and concurrent scenarios, and C is suitable for scenarios where extreme performance and low-level control are required. 1) Golang improves performance through garbage collection and concurrency mechanisms, and is suitable for high-concurrency Web service development. 2) C achieves the ultimate performance through manual memory management and compiler optimization, and is suitable for embedded system development.

The performance differences between Golang and C are mainly reflected in memory management, compilation optimization and runtime efficiency. 1) Golang's garbage collection mechanism is convenient but may affect performance, 2) C's manual memory management and compiler optimization are more efficient in recursive computing.

C is more suitable for scenarios where direct control of hardware resources and high performance optimization is required, while Golang is more suitable for scenarios where rapid development and high concurrency processing are required. 1.C's advantage lies in its close to hardware characteristics and high optimization capabilities, which are suitable for high-performance needs such as game development. 2.Golang's advantage lies in its concise syntax and natural concurrency support, which is suitable for high concurrency service development.
