


Why does the provided Go code with WaitGroup and buffered channel result in a deadlock?
Deadlocks in Go with WaitGroup and Buffered Channels
In Go, a deadlock occurs when multiple goroutines are waiting for each other to complete, resulting in a stalemate. This situation can arise when using buffered channels and WaitGroups incorrectly.
Consider the following code:
<code class="go">package main import "fmt" import "sync" func main() { ch := make(chan []int, 4) var m []int var wg sync.WaitGroup for i := 0; i < 5; i++ { wg.Add(1) go func() { defer wg.Done() ch <- m return }() } wg.Wait() for c := range ch { fmt.Printf("c is %v", c) } }</code>
This code is expected to create a channel with a buffer size of 4 and start 5 goroutines, each sending an empty slice to the channel. The main goroutine waits for all goroutines to finish and then ranges over the channel.
However, this code will result in a deadlock. Why?
Cause of the Deadlock:
Two problems exist in the code:
- Channel Capacity: The channel has a capacity of 4, which means it can hold up to 4 elements. However, there are 5 goroutines trying to send to the channel, resulting in a situation where the last goroutine will block waiting for a slot to be freed.
- Closing the Channel: The range ch loop continues to wait for elements to enter the channel. Since there are no more goroutines left to write to the channel, the loop will wait indefinitely.
Solutions:
-
Increase Channel Capacity: By increasing the channel capacity to 5, enough slots will be available for all goroutines to send their values without blocking. Additionally, closing the channel after the goroutines have finished writing will signal to the range loop that no more elements are coming, preventing it from waiting indefinitely.
<code class="go">ch := make(chan []int, 5) ... wg.Wait() close(ch)</code>
Copy after login -
Use Done() within the Loop: Instead of closing the channel, one can use the Done() method of WaitGroup to signal when the last goroutine has finished. By calling Done() within the range loop, the main goroutine will be notified when the channel is empty and the loop can exit.
<code class="go">go func() { for c := range ch { fmt.Printf("c is %v\n", c) wg.Done() } }() wg.Wait()</code>
Copy after login
These solutions resolve the deadlock by ensuring that the channel has sufficient capacity and that the range loop exits when there are no more elements to read from the channel.
The above is the detailed content of Why does the provided Go code with WaitGroup and buffered channel result in a deadlock?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

Notepad++7.3.1
Easy-to-use and free code editor

SublimeText3 Chinese version
Chinese version, very easy to use

Zend Studio 13.0.1
Powerful PHP integrated development environment

Dreamweaver CS6
Visual web development tools

SublimeText3 Mac version
God-level code editing software (SublimeText3)

Hot Topics











Go language performs well in building efficient and scalable systems. Its advantages include: 1. High performance: compiled into machine code, fast running speed; 2. Concurrent programming: simplify multitasking through goroutines and channels; 3. Simplicity: concise syntax, reducing learning and maintenance costs; 4. Cross-platform: supports cross-platform compilation, easy deployment.

Golang is better than Python in terms of performance and scalability. 1) Golang's compilation-type characteristics and efficient concurrency model make it perform well in high concurrency scenarios. 2) Python, as an interpreted language, executes slowly, but can optimize performance through tools such as Cython.

Golang is better than C in concurrency, while C is better than Golang in raw speed. 1) Golang achieves efficient concurrency through goroutine and channel, which is suitable for handling a large number of concurrent tasks. 2)C Through compiler optimization and standard library, it provides high performance close to hardware, suitable for applications that require extreme optimization.

Goimpactsdevelopmentpositivelythroughspeed,efficiency,andsimplicity.1)Speed:Gocompilesquicklyandrunsefficiently,idealforlargeprojects.2)Efficiency:Itscomprehensivestandardlibraryreducesexternaldependencies,enhancingdevelopmentefficiency.3)Simplicity:

Golang and Python each have their own advantages: Golang is suitable for high performance and concurrent programming, while Python is suitable for data science and web development. Golang is known for its concurrency model and efficient performance, while Python is known for its concise syntax and rich library ecosystem.

The performance differences between Golang and C are mainly reflected in memory management, compilation optimization and runtime efficiency. 1) Golang's garbage collection mechanism is convenient but may affect performance, 2) C's manual memory management and compiler optimization are more efficient in recursive computing.

Golang is suitable for rapid development and concurrent scenarios, and C is suitable for scenarios where extreme performance and low-level control are required. 1) Golang improves performance through garbage collection and concurrency mechanisms, and is suitable for high-concurrency Web service development. 2) C achieves the ultimate performance through manual memory management and compiler optimization, and is suitable for embedded system development.

Golang and C each have their own advantages in performance competitions: 1) Golang is suitable for high concurrency and rapid development, and 2) C provides higher performance and fine-grained control. The selection should be based on project requirements and team technology stack.
