Final vs. Const in Java and C : Are They Truly Equivalents?

Final vs. Const: Understanding the Similarities and Differences

In the Java for C programmers tutorial, the statement "The keyword final is roughly equivalent to const in C " indicates that the two concepts are similar but not identical.

Similarities:

1. Constant Objects: Both final and const are used to create constant objects, which cannot be modified once they have been initialized.
2. Compiler-Enforced: The use of final or const is enforced by the compiler, ensuring that attempts to modify constant objects result in errors.
3. Class Member Variables: Both final and const can be used to mark class member variables as non-modifiable.

Differences:

1. Method Restrictions: In C , const can be used to designate a member function that may be called on const instances, while Java does not have an equivalent.
2. Value Assignments: In Java, final values can be assigned later in the initialization process, while in C they must be provided upon declaration.
3. Constructor Requirements: In Java, final member variables must be initialized before the constructor finishes, while in C they must be initialized using initialization lists.
4. Method Overriding: In Java, final methods cannot be overridden, while in C (before C 11) they can.
5. C 11 Update: C 11 introduced the final keyword, providing semantics identical to Java for both classes and member functions.

In conclusion, while final and const share similarities as keywords used to create constant objects, they have notable differences in certain areas such as method restrictions, value assignments, and constructor requirements. The C 11 update has introduced a final keyword that aligns more closely with Java's usage.

The above is the detailed content of Final vs. Const in Java and C : Are They Truly Equivalents?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!