


Why am I encountering the \'failed to connect: x509: certificate relies on legacy Common Name field, use SANs or temporarily enable Common Name matching with GODEBUG=x509ignoreCN=0\' error w
Error: Certificate Field Discrepancy in Go TLS Connection
When attempting to establish a TLS connection to a MongoDB server with Go, you may encounter the following error:
failed to connect: x509: certificate relies on legacy Common Name field, use SANs or temporarily enable Common Name matching with GODEBUG=x509ignoreCN=0
Cause:
This error occurs when the server's TLS certificate relies on the legacy Common Name (CN) field for identification, but Go's runtime defaults to using Subject Alternative Names (SANs) for TLS connections.
Solution:
There are two main approaches to resolving this issue:
1. Utilize SANs in the Server Certificate:
- Regenerate the server certificate with SANs that match the hostnames or IP addresses used to connect to the server.
- This can be achieved using tools like OpenSSL or third-party certificate authorities.
2. Disable CN Matching Temporarily:
If you cannot regenerate the server certificate immediately, you can temporarily disable CN matching by setting the environment variable:
GODEBUG=x509ignoreCN=0
However, this is not a long-term solution and should be used only to establish connections temporarily.
Code Implementation:
If you choose to fix the issue in your Go code, ensure that the certificate you load contains SANs that match the hostnames used during the connection. Here's an updated version of the code snippet you provided:
<code class="go">const CONFIG_DB_CA = "/etc/ca-files/new-mongo.ca.crt" func main() { cer, err := tls.LoadX509KeyPair("/mongo-server.crt", "/mongo-server.key") if err != nil { log.Println(err) return } roots := x509.NewCertPool() ca, err := ioutil.ReadFile(CONFIG_DB_CA) if err != nil { fmt.Printf("Failed to read or open CA File: %s.\n", CONFIG_DB_CA) return } roots.AppendCertsFromPEM(ca) tlsConfig := &tls.Config{ Certificates: []tls.Certificate{cer}, RootCAs: roots, VerifyPeerCertificate: func(rawCerts [][]*x509.Certificate) error { for _, certs := range rawCerts { for _, cert := range certs { if len(cert.Subject.CommonName) > 0 { continue } for _, dns := range cert.DNSNames { if dns == "customhost" || dns == "customhost:port" { return nil } } return errors.New("certificate does not contain a SAN for the host") } } return errors.New("no valid certificate found") }, } conn, err := tls.Dial("tcp", "customhost:port", tlsConfig) if err != nil { fmt.Printf("failed to connect: %v.\n", err) return } err = conn.VerifyHostname("customhost") if err != nil { panic("Hostname doesn't match with certificate: " + err.Error()) } for i, cert := range conn.ConnectionState().PeerCertificates { prefix := fmt.Sprintf("CERT%d::", i+1) fmt.Printf("%sIssuer: %s\n", prefix, cert.Issuer) fmt.Printf("%sExpiry: %v\n", prefix, cert.NotAfter.Format(time.RFC850)) fmt.Printf("%sDNSNames: %v\n\n", prefix, cert.DNSNames) } fmt.Printf("Success!") }</code>
This updated code uses a custom VerifyPeerCertificate function to verify that the certificate contains either a CN that matches the hostname or a SAN that matches the hostname. If a suitable certificate is found, the connection will succeed.
The above is the detailed content of Why am I encountering the \'failed to connect: x509: certificate relies on legacy Common Name field, use SANs or temporarily enable Common Name matching with GODEBUG=x509ignoreCN=0\' error w. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

Notepad++7.3.1
Easy-to-use and free code editor

SublimeText3 Chinese version
Chinese version, very easy to use

Zend Studio 13.0.1
Powerful PHP integrated development environment

Dreamweaver CS6
Visual web development tools

SublimeText3 Mac version
God-level code editing software (SublimeText3)

Hot Topics











Go language performs well in building efficient and scalable systems. Its advantages include: 1. High performance: compiled into machine code, fast running speed; 2. Concurrent programming: simplify multitasking through goroutines and channels; 3. Simplicity: concise syntax, reducing learning and maintenance costs; 4. Cross-platform: supports cross-platform compilation, easy deployment.

Golang is better than Python in terms of performance and scalability. 1) Golang's compilation-type characteristics and efficient concurrency model make it perform well in high concurrency scenarios. 2) Python, as an interpreted language, executes slowly, but can optimize performance through tools such as Cython.

Golang is better than C in concurrency, while C is better than Golang in raw speed. 1) Golang achieves efficient concurrency through goroutine and channel, which is suitable for handling a large number of concurrent tasks. 2)C Through compiler optimization and standard library, it provides high performance close to hardware, suitable for applications that require extreme optimization.

Goimpactsdevelopmentpositivelythroughspeed,efficiency,andsimplicity.1)Speed:Gocompilesquicklyandrunsefficiently,idealforlargeprojects.2)Efficiency:Itscomprehensivestandardlibraryreducesexternaldependencies,enhancingdevelopmentefficiency.3)Simplicity:

Golang and Python each have their own advantages: Golang is suitable for high performance and concurrent programming, while Python is suitable for data science and web development. Golang is known for its concurrency model and efficient performance, while Python is known for its concise syntax and rich library ecosystem.

The performance differences between Golang and C are mainly reflected in memory management, compilation optimization and runtime efficiency. 1) Golang's garbage collection mechanism is convenient but may affect performance, 2) C's manual memory management and compiler optimization are more efficient in recursive computing.

Golang is suitable for rapid development and concurrent scenarios, and C is suitable for scenarios where extreme performance and low-level control are required. 1) Golang improves performance through garbage collection and concurrency mechanisms, and is suitable for high-concurrency Web service development. 2) C achieves the ultimate performance through manual memory management and compiler optimization, and is suitable for embedded system development.

Golang and C each have their own advantages in performance competitions: 1) Golang is suitable for high concurrency and rapid development, and 2) C provides higher performance and fine-grained control. The selection should be based on project requirements and team technology stack.
