


How to Efficiently Marshal Large Data Streams in JSON without Loading into Memory?
Marshaling Large Data Streams in JSON without Loading into Memory
The need to encode large data streams into JSON often arises, but loading the entire stream into memory at once can be impractical. This article explores ways to overcome this challenge without the built-in json.Marshaler interface.
Encoding with json.Encoder: A Limitation
Attempts to encode a large stream of data with json.Encoder will fail due to its inability to handle channels (chan string) in memory.
Custom JSON Encoding
In the absence of a suitable built-in solution, custom JSON encoding becomes necessary. This involves manually building the JSON string, as demonstrated in the snippet below:
w := os.Stdout w.WriteString(`{ "Foo": "` + t.Foo + `", "Bar": [`) for x := range t.Bar { _ = json.NewEncoder(w).Encode(x) w.WriteString(`,`) } w.WriteString(`]}`)
Extending encoding/json for Channel Support
To enhance the encoding/json package with channel support, you can modify the reflectValueQuoted function in encoding/json/encode.go. Specifically, add a case for channels similar to the following:
case reflect.Chan: e.WriteByte('[') i := 0 for { x, ok := v.Recv() if !ok { break } if i > 0 { e.WriteByte(',') } e.reflectValue(x) i++ } e.WriteByte(']')
Conclusion
While the encoding/json package does not currently support channel encoding, this article provides alternative approaches for marshaling large data streams in JSON efficiently. Custom encoding allows streaming data directly into the JSON output, while extending encoding/json offers a more robust solution.
The above is the detailed content of How to Efficiently Marshal Large Data Streams in JSON without Loading into Memory?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

Notepad++7.3.1
Easy-to-use and free code editor

SublimeText3 Chinese version
Chinese version, very easy to use

Zend Studio 13.0.1
Powerful PHP integrated development environment

Dreamweaver CS6
Visual web development tools

SublimeText3 Mac version
God-level code editing software (SublimeText3)

Hot Topics











Go language performs well in building efficient and scalable systems. Its advantages include: 1. High performance: compiled into machine code, fast running speed; 2. Concurrent programming: simplify multitasking through goroutines and channels; 3. Simplicity: concise syntax, reducing learning and maintenance costs; 4. Cross-platform: supports cross-platform compilation, easy deployment.

Golang is better than Python in terms of performance and scalability. 1) Golang's compilation-type characteristics and efficient concurrency model make it perform well in high concurrency scenarios. 2) Python, as an interpreted language, executes slowly, but can optimize performance through tools such as Cython.

Golang is better than C in concurrency, while C is better than Golang in raw speed. 1) Golang achieves efficient concurrency through goroutine and channel, which is suitable for handling a large number of concurrent tasks. 2)C Through compiler optimization and standard library, it provides high performance close to hardware, suitable for applications that require extreme optimization.

Goimpactsdevelopmentpositivelythroughspeed,efficiency,andsimplicity.1)Speed:Gocompilesquicklyandrunsefficiently,idealforlargeprojects.2)Efficiency:Itscomprehensivestandardlibraryreducesexternaldependencies,enhancingdevelopmentefficiency.3)Simplicity:

Golang and Python each have their own advantages: Golang is suitable for high performance and concurrent programming, while Python is suitable for data science and web development. Golang is known for its concurrency model and efficient performance, while Python is known for its concise syntax and rich library ecosystem.

Golang is suitable for rapid development and concurrent scenarios, and C is suitable for scenarios where extreme performance and low-level control are required. 1) Golang improves performance through garbage collection and concurrency mechanisms, and is suitable for high-concurrency Web service development. 2) C achieves the ultimate performance through manual memory management and compiler optimization, and is suitable for embedded system development.

The performance differences between Golang and C are mainly reflected in memory management, compilation optimization and runtime efficiency. 1) Golang's garbage collection mechanism is convenient but may affect performance, 2) C's manual memory management and compiler optimization are more efficient in recursive computing.

Golang and C each have their own advantages in performance competitions: 1) Golang is suitable for high concurrency and rapid development, and 2) C provides higher performance and fine-grained control. The selection should be based on project requirements and team technology stack.
