Does ob_flush() and flush() work together for reliable output delivery in PHP?

Output Buffering in PHP: Dissecting ob_flush() and flush()

The world of PHP output buffering can be a labyrinthine maze, leaving developers grappling with the differences between ob_flush() and flush(). To unravel this enigma, let's delve into their distinct functions.

ob_flush() vs. flush()

• ob_flush() sends the contents of the current output buffer, which is a mechanism employed within the PHP script for buffering output. It helps pass the data to the next layer in the buffering sequence.
• flush() flushes the PHP write buffers, as well as any additional buffers used by the PHP backend (such as CGI or web servers). However, it's important to note that flush() may not override the buffering settings imposed by the web server.

Why Both?

To understand the necessity of using both functions, consider the following scenario:

• PHP Buffering: PHP may buffer output depending on the backend it's utilizing. For instance, FastCGI may have a dedicated socket buffer. Invoking flush() ensures that the current output content is delivered to the web server.
• Web Server Buffering: Certain web servers, such as Apache, may implement their own buffering mechanisms, which are typically configured and activated intentionally. This buffering layer is also bypassed when flush() is used.

Practical Implications

In practice, it's generally advisable to employ both ob_flush() and flush() for reliable output delivery. Ob_flush() ensures that the data is passed from the PHP script to the PHP backend, while flush() handles the transference from the backend to the web server. This comprehensive approach provides a reliable means of delivering output content to the intended destination.

The above is the detailed content of Does ob_flush() and flush() work together for reliable output delivery in PHP?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!