


Why does io.Copy() create large sparse files, and how can you efficiently copy them while preserving their sparseness?
io.Copy() Creates Large Sparse Files: A Comprehensive Guide
Background on File Sparseness
io.Copy() operates at the byte level, transferring raw data between an input and output stream. It lacks the ability to handle file sparseness, which is an optimization technique to store data efficiently by creating holes (empty areas) in files.
Challenges with io.Copy()
Therefore, when copying sparse files using io.Copy(), the destination files become large as there's no mechanism to preserve the hole structure. io.Copy() treats sparse files as if they were filled with data, even though they contain empty areas.
Workaround Using Syscalls
To overcome this limitation, one must bypass io.Copy() and implement file copying manually using the syscall package. Specifically, the SEEK_HOLE and SEEK_DATA values should be used in conjunction with lseek(2) to locate holes and data within the source files.
Platform-Specific Considerations
The SEEK_HOLE and SEEK_DATA values vary across platforms, so it's essential to determine their specific values for the target systems. These values can be obtained from header files or system documentation. For instance, Linux systems typically define these values in /usr/include/unistd.h.
Creating Platform-Specific Files
To ensure platform compatibility, it's recommended to create platform-specific files containing the SEEK_HOLE and SEEK_DATA values. This allows developers to easily switch between different platforms without modifying the core code.
Procedure for Reading Sparse Files
When reading sparse files, the key is to identify data-containing regions and read data from those areas. This involves seeking to the next data region using SEEK_HOLE and then reading data until reaching the next hole using SEEK_DATA.
Transferring Sparse Files
Transferring sparse files as sparse requires an additional step. Depending on the target filesystem, fallocate(2) can be used to create holes in the destination file. If fallocate(2) is not supported, it's possible to fill the hole with zeroed blocks and hope that the operating system converts them to actual holes.
Filesystem Considerations
It's important to note that some filesystems do not support holes. If the target filesystem falls into this category, it's not possible to create sparse files using this technique.
Additional Tips
- Consider using os.Rename() to move files within the same filesystem, avoiding the need for copying.
- Refer to Go issue #13548 for further insights into creating sparse tar files.
The above is the detailed content of Why does io.Copy() create large sparse files, and how can you efficiently copy them while preserving their sparseness?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

Notepad++7.3.1
Easy-to-use and free code editor

SublimeText3 Chinese version
Chinese version, very easy to use

Zend Studio 13.0.1
Powerful PHP integrated development environment

Dreamweaver CS6
Visual web development tools

SublimeText3 Mac version
God-level code editing software (SublimeText3)

Hot Topics











Go language performs well in building efficient and scalable systems. Its advantages include: 1. High performance: compiled into machine code, fast running speed; 2. Concurrent programming: simplify multitasking through goroutines and channels; 3. Simplicity: concise syntax, reducing learning and maintenance costs; 4. Cross-platform: supports cross-platform compilation, easy deployment.

Golang is better than Python in terms of performance and scalability. 1) Golang's compilation-type characteristics and efficient concurrency model make it perform well in high concurrency scenarios. 2) Python, as an interpreted language, executes slowly, but can optimize performance through tools such as Cython.

Golang is better than C in concurrency, while C is better than Golang in raw speed. 1) Golang achieves efficient concurrency through goroutine and channel, which is suitable for handling a large number of concurrent tasks. 2)C Through compiler optimization and standard library, it provides high performance close to hardware, suitable for applications that require extreme optimization.

Goimpactsdevelopmentpositivelythroughspeed,efficiency,andsimplicity.1)Speed:Gocompilesquicklyandrunsefficiently,idealforlargeprojects.2)Efficiency:Itscomprehensivestandardlibraryreducesexternaldependencies,enhancingdevelopmentefficiency.3)Simplicity:

Golang and Python each have their own advantages: Golang is suitable for high performance and concurrent programming, while Python is suitable for data science and web development. Golang is known for its concurrency model and efficient performance, while Python is known for its concise syntax and rich library ecosystem.

The performance differences between Golang and C are mainly reflected in memory management, compilation optimization and runtime efficiency. 1) Golang's garbage collection mechanism is convenient but may affect performance, 2) C's manual memory management and compiler optimization are more efficient in recursive computing.

Golang is suitable for rapid development and concurrent scenarios, and C is suitable for scenarios where extreme performance and low-level control are required. 1) Golang improves performance through garbage collection and concurrency mechanisms, and is suitable for high-concurrency Web service development. 2) C achieves the ultimate performance through manual memory management and compiler optimization, and is suitable for embedded system development.

Golang and C each have their own advantages in performance competitions: 1) Golang is suitable for high concurrency and rapid development, and 2) C provides higher performance and fine-grained control. The selection should be based on project requirements and team technology stack.
