Home > Java > javaTutorial > body text

Why Does Java\'s Modulo Operator (%) Return Different Results Than Python for Negative Dividends?

Barbara Streisand
Release: 2024-10-30 14:34:30
Original
354 people have browsed it

Why Does Java's Modulo Operator (%) Return Different Results Than Python for Negative Dividends?

Modulo Behavior Difference in Java and Python

In Java, the modulo operator (%) yields the remainder when dividing one number by another. However, for negative dividends, Python returns the modulus, while Java returns the remainder. The modulus is always positive, whereas the remainder retains the sign of the dividend.

To align Java's modulo behavior with Python's, a modification is necessary. This can be achieved by adding another modulo operation or an adjustment to the sign of the result.

For example:

<code class="java">int i = (((-1 % 2) + 2) % 2); // adds 2 to the initial remainder and takes the modulus again</code>
Copy after login

or

<code class="java">int i = -1 % 2;
if (i < 0) i += 2; // adds 2 if the initial remainder is negative</code>
Copy after login

By making this adjustment, the result will match the expected modulus behavior in Python, ensuring positive values for negative dividends when performing modulo operations.

The above is the detailed content of Why Does Java\'s Modulo Operator (%) Return Different Results Than Python for Negative Dividends?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

source:php.cn
Statement of this Website
The content of this article is voluntarily contributed by netizens, and the copyright belongs to the original author. This site does not assume corresponding legal responsibility. If you find any content suspected of plagiarism or infringement, please contact admin@php.cn
Latest Articles by Author
Popular Tutorials
More>
Latest Downloads
More>
Web Effects
Website Source Code
Website Materials
Front End Template
About us Disclaimer Sitemap
php.cn:Public welfare online PHP training,Help PHP learners grow quickly!