const char * const versus const char *
When declaring a pointer variable in C , understanding the subtle differences between these two declarations is crucial.
Example Code:
<code class="cpp">void print_string(const char * the_string) { cout << the_string << endl; } int main () { print_string("What's up?"); }</code>
Declaration Differences:
Why Both Work:
In this example, both declarations work because the parameter the_string is passed a string literal: "What's up?" String literals are stored in read-only memory, meaning their contents cannot be modified.
Relevant Applications:
Using const char * const is more appropriate when you want to prevent any modifications to either the character or the pointer inside the function. This ensures data integrity and prevents unintentional changes. The verbosity of the declaration may have led the developer to use const char *, but the former is more correct.
Declaration Summary:
Declaration | Can Modify Character | Can Modify Pointer |
---|---|---|
char* the_string | Yes | Yes |
const char* the_string | No | Yes |
char* const the_string | Yes | No |
const char* const the_string | No | No |
The above is the detailed content of `const char * const` vs. `const char *`: When Should You Use Each?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!