In the realm of CSS, the task of setting the maximum height for elements is often encountered. While there are various approaches, two widely used techniques involve employing either height:100% or min-height:100%. But what are their distinct characteristics?
According to the W3C specification, both min-height and max-height properties influence the actual height property of an element through a specific algorithm:
In essence, min-height ensures that the element will occupy at least the specified height, even if other factors would otherwise result in a shorter height. On the other hand, max-height limits the element's height to the specified value, preventing it from exceeding that limit.
In the specific case of height:100%, the element is forced to assume the height of its containing block. However, if a conflicting property like max-height:50% is applied, the latter will take precedence.
In contrast, min-height:100% will instruct the element to have a minimum height of 100%, regardless of any other height specifications. This means that the computed height will always be at least 100% of the containing block's height, unless overruled by subsequent style properties.
The primary difference between height:100% and min-height:100% lies in their behavior when confronted with conflicting height specifications. Max-height can overrule height, but it cannot overrule min-height because min-height is evaluated after height and before max-height.
The above is the detailed content of Height: 100% vs. Min-Height: 100% in CSS – When Should You Use Which?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!