How to Unmarshall Nested JSON with Unknown Structure Efficiently?
Unmarshalling Nested JSON with Unknown Structure
In this scenario, we are dealing with JSON data with an unknown structure stored in a key-value store. When retrieving entries from the database, we initially unmarshal into a map[string]*json.RawMessage to handle the top-level namespace. However, to further unmarshal the nested data, we need to determine the specific struct to use.
1. Avoiding Repeated Unmarshals:
Repeated unmarshals can potentially affect performance. However, it may be necessary depending on the data structure and access patterns. If unmarshalling speed is critical, consider caching the unmarshalled results.
2. Determining Struct Type:
Method A: Unmarshal to Interface
- Unmarshal the json.RawMessage to a map[string]interface{}.
- Check the value associated with the "type" key.
- Use a switch statement or reflection to determine the correct struct.
Method B: Regular Expression
- Use a regular expression to extract the "type" string from the JSON data.
- Create a map of struct types associated with the possible "type" strings.
- Unmarshal the json.RawMessage to the corresponding struct.
Example:
Method A:
<code class="go">type RawData struct { Id string `json:"id"` Type string `json:"type"` RawData []int `json:"rawdata"` Epoch string `json:"epoch"` } // Unmarshal to interface data := make(map[string]interface{}) json.Unmarshal(*objmap["foo"], &data) // Determine struct type switch data["type"] { case "baz": baz := &RawData{} json.Unmarshal(*objmap["foo"], baz) case "bar": bar := &BarData{} json.Unmarshal(*objmap["foo"], bar) } // Custom struct for nested data type BarData struct { Id string `json:"id"` Type string `json:"type"` RawData []QuxData `json:"rawdata"` Epoch string `json:"epoch"` } type QuxData struct{ Key string `json:"key"` Values []int `json:"values` }</code>
Method B:
<code class="go">// Regular expression to extract type typeRegex := regexp.MustCompile(`"type": "(.+?)"`) // Get "type" string typeString := string(typeRegex.Find(*objmap["foo"])) // Map of struct types structMap := map[string]interface{}{ "baz": &RawData{}, "bar": &BarData{}, } // Unmarshal to corresponding struct dataStruct := structMap[typeString] json.Unmarshal(*objmap["foo"], dataStruct)</code>
By implementing either of these methods, you can determine the correct struct to unmarshal the json.RawMessage into, enabling you to access the nested data efficiently.
The above is the detailed content of How to Unmarshall Nested JSON with Unknown Structure Efficiently?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

Notepad++7.3.1
Easy-to-use and free code editor

SublimeText3 Chinese version
Chinese version, very easy to use

Zend Studio 13.0.1
Powerful PHP integrated development environment

Dreamweaver CS6
Visual web development tools

SublimeText3 Mac version
God-level code editing software (SublimeText3)

Hot Topics











Go language performs well in building efficient and scalable systems. Its advantages include: 1. High performance: compiled into machine code, fast running speed; 2. Concurrent programming: simplify multitasking through goroutines and channels; 3. Simplicity: concise syntax, reducing learning and maintenance costs; 4. Cross-platform: supports cross-platform compilation, easy deployment.

Golang is better than Python in terms of performance and scalability. 1) Golang's compilation-type characteristics and efficient concurrency model make it perform well in high concurrency scenarios. 2) Python, as an interpreted language, executes slowly, but can optimize performance through tools such as Cython.

Golang is better than C in concurrency, while C is better than Golang in raw speed. 1) Golang achieves efficient concurrency through goroutine and channel, which is suitable for handling a large number of concurrent tasks. 2)C Through compiler optimization and standard library, it provides high performance close to hardware, suitable for applications that require extreme optimization.

Goimpactsdevelopmentpositivelythroughspeed,efficiency,andsimplicity.1)Speed:Gocompilesquicklyandrunsefficiently,idealforlargeprojects.2)Efficiency:Itscomprehensivestandardlibraryreducesexternaldependencies,enhancingdevelopmentefficiency.3)Simplicity:

Golang and Python each have their own advantages: Golang is suitable for high performance and concurrent programming, while Python is suitable for data science and web development. Golang is known for its concurrency model and efficient performance, while Python is known for its concise syntax and rich library ecosystem.

Golang is suitable for rapid development and concurrent scenarios, and C is suitable for scenarios where extreme performance and low-level control are required. 1) Golang improves performance through garbage collection and concurrency mechanisms, and is suitable for high-concurrency Web service development. 2) C achieves the ultimate performance through manual memory management and compiler optimization, and is suitable for embedded system development.

The performance differences between Golang and C are mainly reflected in memory management, compilation optimization and runtime efficiency. 1) Golang's garbage collection mechanism is convenient but may affect performance, 2) C's manual memory management and compiler optimization are more efficient in recursive computing.

Golang and C each have their own advantages in performance competitions: 1) Golang is suitable for high concurrency and rapid development, and 2) C provides higher performance and fine-grained control. The selection should be based on project requirements and team technology stack.
