The concept of spurious wakeups in Java synchronization has been a subject of discussion for quite some time. While the potential for such behavior exists, the question remains: Do they actually occur in practice?
According to the Wikipedia article on spurious wakeups, the Linux implementation of the pthread_cond_wait() function utilizes the futex system call. When a process receives a signal, it may return abruptly with EINTR, causing its blocking system calls to terminate early.
This race condition arises because pthread_cond_wait() cannot resume the waiting thread if it has missed a real wakeup while executing outside the futex system call. As a result, a POSIX signal can trigger a spurious wakeup.
The provided Java program demonstrates the concept:
<code class="java">public class Spurious { public static void main(String[] args) { Lock lock = new ReentrantLock(); Condition cond = lock.newCondition(); lock.lock(); try { try { cond.await(); System.out.println("Spurious wakeup!"); } catch (InterruptedException ex) { System.out.println("Just a regular interrupt."); } } finally { lock.unlock(); } } }</code>
To induce a spurious wakeup in this Java program, a signal can be sent to the process while it is waiting on the condition. This can be achieved on Linux using a command like:
<code class="bash">kill -s SIGUSR1 <PID of Java process></code>
While spurious wakeups can be considered an annoyance in some scenarios, their occurrence is generally rare in modern operating systems. They do, however, play a role in the performance optimization of the system by preventing unnecessary busy waiting and reducing overhead when dealing with multiple threads waiting on the same condition variable.
The above is the detailed content of Do Spurious Wakeups in Java Really Occur?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!