Efficiently Copying Streams to Prevent "Stream Closed" Errors
Java 8 streams provide a powerful mechanism for data processing, but their single-use nature can sometimes pose challenges when multiple operations are required on the same data. This issue manifests as the "stream has already been operated upon or closed" error.
Problem Statement:
To avoid the above error, some developers resort to converting streams to lists before processing. While this approach works, it can compromise efficiency and introduce additional steps. Can we find a more elegant and efficient solution?
Answer:
The assumption that copying a stream is more efficient than storing it is not entirely accurate. In cases where data needs to be reused multiple times, either storage or stream splitting is necessary.
Streams offer significant optimizations for single-use scenarios, such as loop fusion, which enables efficient processing of the entire data pipeline. However, reusing the same data requires either generating it twice or storing it.
Attempting to implement "forked streams" in Java streams proved costly, burdening the common case of single-use for the rare case of reuse. The challenge arises when the two pipelines consume data at different rates, necessitating buffering.
Recommended Approaches:
<code class="java">stream()...stuff....forEach(e -> { consumerA(e); consumerB(e); });</code>
Alternative Option:
The above is the detailed content of How to Efficiently Copy Streams in Java to Avoid 'Stream Closed' Errors?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!