


Why Do Ab and Wrk Show Such a Large Difference in Go HTTP Server Testing Results?
Go HTTP Server Testing: Ab vs. wrk -- A Significant Result Disparity
In an attempt to determine the request-handling capacity of a Go HTTP server, two testing tools, ab and wrk, were employed, yielding vastly different results. Ab, which generated approximately 8295 requests per second, stands in stark contrast to wrk's output of 26767 requests per second.
The discrepancy between these tools' findings can be attributed to several factors:
- Benchmarks' Synthetic Nature: Benchmarks tend to present a simplified environment that may not accurately reflect real-world scenarios. As additional complexities are introduced, such as database interactions or template rendering, performance metrics can decline significantly.
- System-Specific Factors: Hardware and software configurations can impact results. For instance, the availability of resources can vary between the development environment and a production server, leading to differences in performance.
- Tool Quality: Ab is generally considered less reliable than wrk, as it operates solely on the HTTP/1.0 protocol and lacks keepalive functionality.
- Test Duration Disparity: The ab test ran for 12 seconds while the wrk test lasted for 5 seconds, introducing a potential bias in the results.
- Denotative Significance of Results: Even a relatively low benchmark result of 8k requests per second translates to a substantial load capacity of 28 million requests per hour. Hence, it is important to contextualize the significance of these figures.
Despite the disparity, both ab and wrk provide valuable insights into a server's performance characteristics. However, it is crucial to consider the limitations of these tools and interpret the results cautiously, mindful of the factors that can influence their accuracy.
The above is the detailed content of Why Do Ab and Wrk Show Such a Large Difference in Go HTTP Server Testing Results?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

Notepad++7.3.1
Easy-to-use and free code editor

SublimeText3 Chinese version
Chinese version, very easy to use

Zend Studio 13.0.1
Powerful PHP integrated development environment

Dreamweaver CS6
Visual web development tools

SublimeText3 Mac version
God-level code editing software (SublimeText3)

Hot Topics











Go language performs well in building efficient and scalable systems. Its advantages include: 1. High performance: compiled into machine code, fast running speed; 2. Concurrent programming: simplify multitasking through goroutines and channels; 3. Simplicity: concise syntax, reducing learning and maintenance costs; 4. Cross-platform: supports cross-platform compilation, easy deployment.

Golang is better than Python in terms of performance and scalability. 1) Golang's compilation-type characteristics and efficient concurrency model make it perform well in high concurrency scenarios. 2) Python, as an interpreted language, executes slowly, but can optimize performance through tools such as Cython.

Golang is better than C in concurrency, while C is better than Golang in raw speed. 1) Golang achieves efficient concurrency through goroutine and channel, which is suitable for handling a large number of concurrent tasks. 2)C Through compiler optimization and standard library, it provides high performance close to hardware, suitable for applications that require extreme optimization.

Goimpactsdevelopmentpositivelythroughspeed,efficiency,andsimplicity.1)Speed:Gocompilesquicklyandrunsefficiently,idealforlargeprojects.2)Efficiency:Itscomprehensivestandardlibraryreducesexternaldependencies,enhancingdevelopmentefficiency.3)Simplicity:

Golang and Python each have their own advantages: Golang is suitable for high performance and concurrent programming, while Python is suitable for data science and web development. Golang is known for its concurrency model and efficient performance, while Python is known for its concise syntax and rich library ecosystem.

The performance differences between Golang and C are mainly reflected in memory management, compilation optimization and runtime efficiency. 1) Golang's garbage collection mechanism is convenient but may affect performance, 2) C's manual memory management and compiler optimization are more efficient in recursive computing.

Golang is suitable for rapid development and concurrent scenarios, and C is suitable for scenarios where extreme performance and low-level control are required. 1) Golang improves performance through garbage collection and concurrency mechanisms, and is suitable for high-concurrency Web service development. 2) C achieves the ultimate performance through manual memory management and compiler optimization, and is suitable for embedded system development.

Golang and C each have their own advantages in performance competitions: 1) Golang is suitable for high concurrency and rapid development, and 2) C provides higher performance and fine-grained control. The selection should be based on project requirements and team technology stack.
