What's the Difference Between 'Import' and 'Import Static' Statements in Java?

Understanding the "Static" Modifier in Import Statements

In Java, the import statement allows us to utilize classes from other packages. When using the "static" modifier before "import," there is a subtle difference that warrants exploration.

Difference Between Import Static and Import Statements

When we encounter a statement like:

<code class="java">import static com.showboy.Myclass;</code>

It implies that we are importing all static members of the "Myclass" class within the "com.showboy" package. These static members can then be used without the need to prepend them with "Myclass.".

In comparison, a regular import statement like:

<code class="java">import com.showboy.Myclass;</code>

simply imports the "Myclass" class. To utilize its static members, we still need to use the class name as a prefix, such as "Myclass.myStaticMethod()."

Benefits and Cautions of Static Import

Static import offers the convenience of accessing static members without class qualification. However, it should be used sparingly. Abuse of static import can result in namespace pollution and make code harder to read.

Consider static import when you need frequent access to static members from one or two classes. By naming static members explicitly, you enhance readability. On the other hand, importing all static members from a class should be avoided to prevent confusion and maintainability challenges.

The above is the detailed content of What's the Difference Between 'Import' and 'Import Static' Statements in Java?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!