While exploring CSS capabilities in class, you stumbled upon its remarkable compatibility with imaginary HTML elements. However, your professor expressed disapproval, advising you to employ explicitly declared paragraphs with IDs. This revelation sparks questions about the efficacy and prevalence of such fabricated elements in web development.
Browsers are designed to exhibit forward compatibility, allowing them to interpret elements not yet recognized by HTML specifications. When encountering unidentified elements, browsers incorporate them into the Document Object Model (DOM), although they lack inherent semantics or designated rendering attributes.
As HTML expands, CSS, JavaScript, and ARIA can bridge the gap for elements not officially supported in older browsers. By manipulating these elements within the DOM, developers can provide equivalent functionalities across various browsers.
Your professor's reluctance to endorse made-up elements stems from several considerations:
The use of made-up HTML elements is uncommon for the aforementioned reasons. Professional web developers typically refrain from using them to avoid potential conflicts and maintain adherence to web standards.
The above is the detailed content of Can CSS Style Fictitious HTML Elements - A Valid Approach?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!