The concept of forwarding references and rvalue references sharing the same syntax in C has raised questions among developers. Let's delve into the rationale behind this decision and explore the syntax in detail.
Forwarding references, denoted by T&&, and rvalue references, also denoted by T&&, do not bind to lvalues. However, universal references, denoted by the same syntax, can bind to both rvalues and lvalues. This dual behavior might seem confusing, so let's clarify the underlying mechanism.
Universal references, such as T&&, possess the ability to deduce T as either an "object type" or a "reference type." When passed an rvalue, T can be deduced as an object type, resulting in a function parameter of type T&&. Alternatively, when passed an lvalue, T deduces as a reference type, effectively collapsing to T& based on reference collapsing rules.
This behavior seamlessly integrates with the template argument deduction and reference collapsing rules, with the minor exception that a template parameter can now be deduced as a reference type. The syntax for universal references aligns with this deduction mechanism, allowing for a consistent type system across templates and the rest of the language.
The C committee carefully considered alternative syntaxes but ultimately decided against them. Proposals such as T&&&&&&, T*&, T@, and T&42 were considered, but they were deemed unnecessary and potentially more confusing.
The syntax T&& for universal references ensures compatibility with the reference collapsing rules, providing a syntactically consistent way to handle object types and reference types. By using the same syntax for forwarding references and rvalue references, the language retains simplicity and minimizes confusion.
The above is the detailed content of Why Do C Forwarding References and Rvalue References Share the Same Syntax?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!