How to Gracefully Terminate a Golang Ticker Goroutine?
Ticker Stop Behavior in Golang
When using Golang's ticker package, it's essential to understand the behavior of Stop() and the impact it has on the associated channel. While calling Stop() effectively halts ticker emissions, it doesn't close the channel.
Consider the example:
package main import ( "time" "log" ) func main() { ticker := time.NewTicker(1 * time.Second) go func(){ for _ = range ticker.C { log.Println("tick") } log.Println("stopped") }() time.Sleep(3 * time.Second) log.Println("stopping ticker") ticker.Stop() time.Sleep(3 * time.Second) }
This code demonstrates the unexpected behavior. The ticker channel is stopped using ticker.Stop(), but the corresponding goroutine remains active. This raises concerns about whether the goroutine's continued existence is undesirable and the best approach to handle such situations.
Using a Second Channel for Stopping
One effective solution is to introduce a second channel, specifically for signaling the ticker to stop.
package main import ( "log" "time" ) // Every runs the provided function periodically, allowing the function to control when to stop. func Every(duration time.Duration, work func(time.Time) bool) chan bool { ticker := time.NewTicker(duration) stop := make(chan bool, 1) // Channel for signaling stop go func() { defer log.Println("ticker stopped") for { select { case time := <-ticker.C: if !work(time) { // Function decides to stop stop <- true } case <-stop: // Signal to stop has been received return } } }() return stop } func main() { stop := Every(1*time.Second, func(time.Time) bool { log.Println("tick") return true }) time.Sleep(3 * time.Second) log.Println("stopping ticker") stop <- true // Send the stop signal on the stop channel time.Sleep(3 * time.Second) }
In this modified code, Every() function takes both a duration and a function that returns a boolean indicating whether to continue. The stop channel is used to communicate the stop signal to the ticker goroutine, ensuring its graceful termination.
The above is the detailed content of How to Gracefully Terminate a Golang Ticker Goroutine?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

Notepad++7.3.1
Easy-to-use and free code editor

SublimeText3 Chinese version
Chinese version, very easy to use

Zend Studio 13.0.1
Powerful PHP integrated development environment

Dreamweaver CS6
Visual web development tools

SublimeText3 Mac version
God-level code editing software (SublimeText3)

Hot Topics











Golang is better than Python in terms of performance and scalability. 1) Golang's compilation-type characteristics and efficient concurrency model make it perform well in high concurrency scenarios. 2) Python, as an interpreted language, executes slowly, but can optimize performance through tools such as Cython.

Golang is better than C in concurrency, while C is better than Golang in raw speed. 1) Golang achieves efficient concurrency through goroutine and channel, which is suitable for handling a large number of concurrent tasks. 2)C Through compiler optimization and standard library, it provides high performance close to hardware, suitable for applications that require extreme optimization.

Goimpactsdevelopmentpositivelythroughspeed,efficiency,andsimplicity.1)Speed:Gocompilesquicklyandrunsefficiently,idealforlargeprojects.2)Efficiency:Itscomprehensivestandardlibraryreducesexternaldependencies,enhancingdevelopmentefficiency.3)Simplicity:

Golang and Python each have their own advantages: Golang is suitable for high performance and concurrent programming, while Python is suitable for data science and web development. Golang is known for its concurrency model and efficient performance, while Python is known for its concise syntax and rich library ecosystem.

Golang is suitable for rapid development and concurrent scenarios, and C is suitable for scenarios where extreme performance and low-level control are required. 1) Golang improves performance through garbage collection and concurrency mechanisms, and is suitable for high-concurrency Web service development. 2) C achieves the ultimate performance through manual memory management and compiler optimization, and is suitable for embedded system development.

The performance differences between Golang and C are mainly reflected in memory management, compilation optimization and runtime efficiency. 1) Golang's garbage collection mechanism is convenient but may affect performance, 2) C's manual memory management and compiler optimization are more efficient in recursive computing.

C is more suitable for scenarios where direct control of hardware resources and high performance optimization is required, while Golang is more suitable for scenarios where rapid development and high concurrency processing are required. 1.C's advantage lies in its close to hardware characteristics and high optimization capabilities, which are suitable for high-performance needs such as game development. 2.Golang's advantage lies in its concise syntax and natural concurrency support, which is suitable for high concurrency service development.

Golang and C each have their own advantages in performance competitions: 1) Golang is suitable for high concurrency and rapid development, and 2) C provides higher performance and fine-grained control. The selection should be based on project requirements and team technology stack.
