Dilemma of Namespace Usage in TypeScript External Modules
The Problem:
When attempting to use namespaces in TypeScript external modules, users often encounter confusion due to unexpected behavior. Namely:
Solution: Shift Focus from Namespaces to Modules
The underlying issue stems from a misconception about the purpose of namespaces in external modules. External modules are self-contained, and their main purpose is organization, not conflict avoidance. Therefore, the use of namespaces within external modules is unnecessary and can lead to confusion.
Analogy: The Cupless Solution
Consider a scenario with multiple cups, each representing a namespace. This setup is inefficient because it adds an unnecessary layer between the user and the desired objects/types. Instead, it's better to organize modules directly without relying on namespaces.
Reasons for Avoiding Namespaces in External Modules:
Guidance for Structuring External Modules:
Export Objects as Close to Top-Level as Possible:
Red Flags to Avoid:
The above is the detailed content of Why Should I Avoid Namespaces in TypeScript External Modules?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!