The Standardization of Automatic Pointer Nullification After Delete
The C language lacks an automatic mechanism to set deleted pointers to NULL, leaving programmers vulnerable to crashes resulting from invalid pointer access. This oversight has prompted questions about the reasons behind its exclusion from the standard.
Performance Considerations:
One potential reason is performance concerns. Adding an additional instruction to perform pointer nullification could impact the speed of the delete operation. However, compiler optimizations could potentially mitigate this impact, making it a negligible concern.
Const Pointers:
Another consideration is the handling of const pointers. In theory, the standard could have addressed this special case and allowed automatic nullification for lvalue operands. However, this would require additional complexity in the language semantics.
Documentation from the Language Designer:
Bjarne Stroustrup, the original C designer, has provided insights into the issue:
Argument Types:
The fundamental reason for the lack of automatic nullification, according to Stroustrup, is that delete's argument may not always be an lvalue. Rvalue arguments, such as temporary objects, cannot be nullified without additional overhead and complexity in the language design.
Ultimately, the decision to not include automatic pointer nullification in the C standard was likely a compromise between potential benefits and potential costs. While it could prevent certain crashes, it introduces additional complexity and potential performance implications that may not always be desirable or feasible.
The above is the detailed content of Why Does C Not Automatically Nullify Pointers After Deletion?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!