Increasing Accuracy of Solution of Transcendental Equation
This issue involves estimating the parameters a0, y0, and z0 from a set of measurements, with the goal of improving the accuracy of the solution.
Question 1: How to further improve accuracy of the Solution?
-
Weighting the deviations: Consider weighting the deviations according to the angular distance from 0 degrees. However, it's unclear whether this would significantly improve accuracy, as a(t) may not necessarily include 0 degrees.
-
Increasing the Angular range: The angular range cannot be increased due to design limitations.
-
Increasing the number of points: The accuracy improves with more points up to around 100, after which it becomes unstable for some radii.
-
Using different recursion: Recursions above 6 have minimal impact and increasing accuracy beyond this is challenging.
Question 2: Is there something I have Missed?
-
Measurement accuracy: Ensure the input measurements are as accurate as possible.
-
Calibration tube accuracy: Use a calibration tube with precisely known radius to ensure accurate calibration.
-
Machine vibrations and eccentricity: These factors can affect measurements and should be accounted for if possible.
Additional Considerations:
- Simulation results are generally more accurate with z0 measured. Increasing simulation accuracy beyond 6 recursions does not improve results, as the real input data will also have limited accuracy.
- It's recommended to analyze the inferred r0 and y values as functions of each other to gain insights into the limitations of the method.
The above is the detailed content of How to Improve the Accuracy of Transcendental Equation Solutions: What Have I Missed?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!