Why is notifyAll() Generally Preferred Over notify() in Java?

Understanding the Nuances of Java's notify() vs. notifyAll() Methods

Despite numerous explanations available online, the difference between Java's notify() and notifyAll() methods is often simplified to the number of threads awakened. However, a deeper understanding reveals a more nuanced concept.

While both methods wake threads waiting on an object's monitor, only one thread is selected to acquire the lock and proceed. In the case of notify(), the VM makes an arbitrary selection, whereas notifyAll() relies on the system thread scheduler for the choice.

The key question arises: what is the practical difference between the two methods?

The Importance of notifyAll() Over notify()

The producer/consumer example illustrates why notifyAll() is generally the preferred choice:

public synchronized void put(Object o) {
    while (buf.size() == MAX_SIZE) {
        wait();
    }
    buf.add(o);
    notifyAll();
}

public synchronized Object get() {
    while (buf.size() == 0) {
        wait();
    }
    Object o = buf.remove(0);
    notifyAll();
    return o;
}

In this example, notify() can lead to a deadlock situation when the sequence of events described in the reference material occurs. However, with notifyAll() in place, this deadlock is avoided because all waiting threads are awakened, allowing for proper synchronization.

Additional Insight:

• The while loop surrounding wait() is necessary to protect against spurious wakeups.
• notifyAll() is the safer option in general, particularly in situations where it is unclear which waiting thread should be awakened.
• Replacing notify() with notifyAll() in synchronized methods can prevent potential deadlocks and ensure proper thread communication.

The above is the detailed content of Why is notifyAll() Generally Preferred Over notify() in Java?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!