Why Doesn't C Automatically Nullify Pointers After `delete`?

Automatic Pointer Nullifying After Deletion

The omission of automatic pointer nullification after delete has long puzzled developers. While such a mechanism could prevent crashes by invalidating pointers, it also raises concerns regarding performance and compatibility with const pointers.

Performance Impact

One potential reason for this omission is the performance overhead of the additional instruction required to nullify the pointer. In performance-critical applications, this could have a noticeable impact on execution speed.

Const Pointers

Another consideration is the behavior of const pointers. Nullifying a const pointer would introduce a potential ambiguity as the pointer cannot be reassigned to another value. This could lead to confusion and unexpected behavior in the presence of const pointers.

Stroustrup's Perspective

C creator Bjarne Stroustrup has addressed this issue, noting that the standard explicitly allows implementations of delete to nullify lvalue operands. However, he has observed that this practice is not widely adopted by implementers.

Key Takeaway

While the benefits of automatic pointer nullification after delete are evident, its omission is likely due to a combination of performance concerns and compatibility issues with const pointers. Therefore, developers must explicitly nullify pointers after deleting dynamic memory to prevent invalid pointer access errors.

The above is the detailed content of Why Doesn't C Automatically Nullify Pointers After `delete`?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!