Can C Help Me Prevent Mixing Apples and Oranges in My Code?
Can My Code Mix Apples and Oranges?
In your C project, you use numerous "usings" to clarify the intended purpose of variables, primarily for std::string identifiers like PortalId or CakeId. Your current approach allows the following:
using PortalId = std::string; using CakeId = std::string; PortalId portal_id("2"); CakeId cake_id("is a lie"); portal_id = cake_id; // OK
But this flexibility is undesirable. You seek compile-time type checking to prevent mixing different object types while preserving the original object's functionality.
Can C Fulfill This Request?
Yes, C provides a solution for your dilemma. Using C 17 and some clever coding, it's possible to create a strongly typed identifier that prevents mixing types. The results look something like this:
SAFE_TYPEDEF(std::string, PortalId); SAFE_TYPEDEF(std::string, CakeId); int main() { PortalId portal_id("2"); CakeId cake_id("is a lie"); std::map<CakeId, PortalId> p_to_cake; // OK p_to_cake[cake_id] = portal_id; // OK p_to_cake[portal_id] = cake_id; // COMPILER ERROR portal_id = cake_id; // COMPILER ERROR portal_id = "1.0"; // COMPILER ERROR portal_id = PortalId("42"); // OK return 0; }
In this code, assignments between different types are not permitted, and adding incompatible types to containers will result in compiler errors.
What's the Secret?
The magic lies within the SAFE_TYPEDEF macro. Here's the updated version that handles all your requirements:
#include <iostream> #include <string> #include <map> #include <unordered_map> // define some tags to create uniqueness struct portal_tag {}; struct cake_tag {}; // a string-like identifier that is typed on a tag type template<class Tag> struct string_id { using tag_type = Tag; // needs to be default-constuctable because of use in map[] below string_id(std::string s) : _value(std::move(s)) {} string_id() : _value() {} // provide access to the underlying string value const std::string& value() const { return _value; } private: std::string _value; // will only compare against same type of id. friend bool operator < (const string_id& l, const string_id& r) { return l._value < r._value; } friend bool operator == (const string_id& l, const string_id& r) { return l._value == r._value; } // and let's go ahead and provide expected free functions friend auto to_string(const string_id& r) -> const std::string& { return r._value; } friend auto operator << (std::ostream& os, const string_id& sid) -> std::ostream& { return os << sid.value(); } friend std::size_t hash_code(const string_id& sid) { std::size_t seed = typeid(tag_type).hash_code(); seed ^= std::hash<std::string>()(sid._value); return seed; } }; // let's make it hashable namespace std { template<class Tag> struct hash<string_id<Tag>> { using argument_type = string_id<Tag>; using result_type = std::size_t; result_type operator()(const argument_type& arg) const { return hash_code(arg); } }; } // create some type aliases for ease of use using PortalId = string_id<portal_tag>; using CakeId = string_id<cake_tag>; using namespace std;
This code defines a string_id class that serves as a strongly typed identifier. It's tagged with either portal_tag or cake_tag to ensure uniqueness. The class also overloads operators like <, "==", and free functions such as to_string, <<, and hash_code.
With this implementation, you can enforce strong typing and prevent mixing types in your code. It covers all the scenarios you mentioned in your question and provides a stable solution for your requirements.
The above is the detailed content of Can C Help Me Prevent Mixing Apples and Oranges in My Code?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

Notepad++7.3.1
Easy-to-use and free code editor

SublimeText3 Chinese version
Chinese version, very easy to use

Zend Studio 13.0.1
Powerful PHP integrated development environment

Dreamweaver CS6
Visual web development tools

SublimeText3 Mac version
God-level code editing software (SublimeText3)

Hot Topics











The history and evolution of C# and C are unique, and the future prospects are also different. 1.C was invented by BjarneStroustrup in 1983 to introduce object-oriented programming into the C language. Its evolution process includes multiple standardizations, such as C 11 introducing auto keywords and lambda expressions, C 20 introducing concepts and coroutines, and will focus on performance and system-level programming in the future. 2.C# was released by Microsoft in 2000. Combining the advantages of C and Java, its evolution focuses on simplicity and productivity. For example, C#2.0 introduced generics and C#5.0 introduced asynchronous programming, which will focus on developers' productivity and cloud computing in the future.

The future development trends of C and XML are: 1) C will introduce new features such as modules, concepts and coroutines through the C 20 and C 23 standards to improve programming efficiency and security; 2) XML will continue to occupy an important position in data exchange and configuration files, but will face the challenges of JSON and YAML, and will develop in a more concise and easy-to-parse direction, such as the improvements of XMLSchema1.1 and XPath3.1.

C Reasons for continuous use include its high performance, wide application and evolving characteristics. 1) High-efficiency performance: C performs excellently in system programming and high-performance computing by directly manipulating memory and hardware. 2) Widely used: shine in the fields of game development, embedded systems, etc. 3) Continuous evolution: Since its release in 1983, C has continued to add new features to maintain its competitiveness.

There are significant differences in the learning curves of C# and C and developer experience. 1) The learning curve of C# is relatively flat and is suitable for rapid development and enterprise-level applications. 2) The learning curve of C is steep and is suitable for high-performance and low-level control scenarios.

C interacts with XML through third-party libraries (such as TinyXML, Pugixml, Xerces-C). 1) Use the library to parse XML files and convert them into C-processable data structures. 2) When generating XML, convert the C data structure to XML format. 3) In practical applications, XML is often used for configuration files and data exchange to improve development efficiency.

The modern C design model uses new features of C 11 and beyond to help build more flexible and efficient software. 1) Use lambda expressions and std::function to simplify observer pattern. 2) Optimize performance through mobile semantics and perfect forwarding. 3) Intelligent pointers ensure type safety and resource management.

C Learners and developers can get resources and support from StackOverflow, Reddit's r/cpp community, Coursera and edX courses, open source projects on GitHub, professional consulting services, and CppCon. 1. StackOverflow provides answers to technical questions; 2. Reddit's r/cpp community shares the latest news; 3. Coursera and edX provide formal C courses; 4. Open source projects on GitHub such as LLVM and Boost improve skills; 5. Professional consulting services such as JetBrains and Perforce provide technical support; 6. CppCon and other conferences help careers

C still has important relevance in modern programming. 1) High performance and direct hardware operation capabilities make it the first choice in the fields of game development, embedded systems and high-performance computing. 2) Rich programming paradigms and modern features such as smart pointers and template programming enhance its flexibility and efficiency. Although the learning curve is steep, its powerful capabilities make it still important in today's programming ecosystem.
