How to Effectively Scan Nested Structs Using SQLX?
Structs Within Structs: A Guide to SQLX's Advanced Scanning
While using SQLX, you might encounter challenges scanning data into nested structs. Let's consider this example:
type Customer struct { Id int `json:"id" db:"id"` Name string `json:"name" db:"name"` Address Address `json:"adress"` // Oops, missing embedded property } type Address struct { Street string `json:"street" db:"street"` City string `json:"city" db:"city"` }
When attempting to scan data using this definition, you'll encounter this error:
missing destination name street in *models.Customer
Solution: Embrace Embedded Structs
The key to resolving this issue lies in understanding SQLX's deep scanning capabilities. As the documentation suggests, it supports embedding structs, promoting their fields into the parent struct. To achieve this, simply embed Address into Customer:
type Customer struct { Id int `json:"id" db:"id"` Name string `json:"name" db:"name"` Address Address }
Note that we removed the Address field's own db tag, as it's no longer a separate entity.
Caution: Flatten the JSON Output
However, embedding Address flattens the JSON output of the Customer struct, as both Name and City are now direct properties:
{ "id": 1, "name": "foo", "street": "bar", "city": "baz" }
Possible Alternatives
If this is not desired, there are several alternative approaches:
- Remapping: Scan data into a map[string]interface{} and remap it using custom logic.
- Defining Interface Types: Create an interface representing the desired data structure and implement it with both the Address and Customer structs.
The above is the detailed content of How to Effectively Scan Nested Structs Using SQLX?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

Notepad++7.3.1
Easy-to-use and free code editor

SublimeText3 Chinese version
Chinese version, very easy to use

Zend Studio 13.0.1
Powerful PHP integrated development environment

Dreamweaver CS6
Visual web development tools

SublimeText3 Mac version
God-level code editing software (SublimeText3)

Hot Topics











Go language performs well in building efficient and scalable systems. Its advantages include: 1. High performance: compiled into machine code, fast running speed; 2. Concurrent programming: simplify multitasking through goroutines and channels; 3. Simplicity: concise syntax, reducing learning and maintenance costs; 4. Cross-platform: supports cross-platform compilation, easy deployment.

Golang is better than Python in terms of performance and scalability. 1) Golang's compilation-type characteristics and efficient concurrency model make it perform well in high concurrency scenarios. 2) Python, as an interpreted language, executes slowly, but can optimize performance through tools such as Cython.

Golang is better than C in concurrency, while C is better than Golang in raw speed. 1) Golang achieves efficient concurrency through goroutine and channel, which is suitable for handling a large number of concurrent tasks. 2)C Through compiler optimization and standard library, it provides high performance close to hardware, suitable for applications that require extreme optimization.

Goimpactsdevelopmentpositivelythroughspeed,efficiency,andsimplicity.1)Speed:Gocompilesquicklyandrunsefficiently,idealforlargeprojects.2)Efficiency:Itscomprehensivestandardlibraryreducesexternaldependencies,enhancingdevelopmentefficiency.3)Simplicity:

Golang and Python each have their own advantages: Golang is suitable for high performance and concurrent programming, while Python is suitable for data science and web development. Golang is known for its concurrency model and efficient performance, while Python is known for its concise syntax and rich library ecosystem.

Golang is suitable for rapid development and concurrent scenarios, and C is suitable for scenarios where extreme performance and low-level control are required. 1) Golang improves performance through garbage collection and concurrency mechanisms, and is suitable for high-concurrency Web service development. 2) C achieves the ultimate performance through manual memory management and compiler optimization, and is suitable for embedded system development.

The performance differences between Golang and C are mainly reflected in memory management, compilation optimization and runtime efficiency. 1) Golang's garbage collection mechanism is convenient but may affect performance, 2) C's manual memory management and compiler optimization are more efficient in recursive computing.

Golang and C each have their own advantages in performance competitions: 1) Golang is suitable for high concurrency and rapid development, and 2) C provides higher performance and fine-grained control. The selection should be based on project requirements and team technology stack.
